Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Citroen Reviews

Citroën was created in 1919 as the maker of worthy, solid but ultimately quite dull cars. And then came the revolutionary Traction Avant in 1934 with its front-wheel drive and modern styling. That established Citroën as a forward-thinking carmaker, which was capable of building mould-breaking cars, such as the supremely clever 2CV and the Hydropneumatically-suspended DS, the Maserati-engined SM, the futuristic CX and the novel GS.

A takeover by Peugeot in 1975 initially killed off some of Citroën’s quirkiness – although 1982’s BX and '89's XM was in the marque's best mad traditions – but individuality and daring have returned again in recent years… thanks to the ill-fated C6 and subsequent DS-line of cars to supplement that company's more mundane products.

Good: Tin Snail is a economy motoring icon, comfortable, long-legged, limpet-like grip and a roll-back canvas roof
Bad: Lack of outright performance takes a little getting used to
Good: Amazing ride quality, space ship looks, advanced specification which in some ways is still contemporary
Bad: Horrible when structural corrosion takes hold
Good: Like a DS but with even more room inside
Bad: Generally led a harder life, so more rare, and surviving examples more likely to suffer from problems
Good: Effortlessly stylish four-seater cabriolet
Bad: Genuine ones cost a fortune, so watch out for fakes
Good: Additional performance and room over a 2CV, fastback and estate versions very practical
Bad: Frankly bizarre styling of reverse-rake Ami 6
Good: More power makes the DS even more irresistible
Bad: The complexity of hydraulics, and hidden structural corrosion
Good: Like a 2CV, but bigger, a little plusher and with a more useful hatchback
Bad: Not as cool as the 2CV, and therefore harder to justify its failings
Good: Simple basic fun
Bad: Not so fun in Scotland. In the winter
Good: Supreme high-speed cruiser, off-beat Maserati V6, superior steering and brakes, idiosyncratic styling, superbly comfortable
Bad: Not a DIY proposition, engine rebuild costs, tough to restore
Good: Soft ride and self levelling suspension, excellent steering, visibility and brakes
Bad: Not as economical as it should be, flat-four engine is very vocal, rare and hard to find parts for
Good: Otherworldly ride comfort, effortless long distance cruising, roomy interior, head-turning looks
Bad: Complex mechanics for the uninitiated, ultra-sensitive controls take some getting used to, structural rust can be a show-stopper in terms of difficulty fixing
Good: Roomy, comfortable, characterful flat-twin, interesting dashboard, sporting models go well, Decapotable version is a cheap fun convertible
Bad: Rust, poor parts and specialist support, almost extinct
Good: Magic carpet ride, easier to maintain and service than you might think, all models go well for their engine sizes due to low weight
Bad: Some parts getting hard to find, plastic panels and a rust-free body can hide corrosion nightmares underneath, still considered a banger by those who don' get them
Good: Fast and fine handling, effectively a five-door Peugeot 205GTI
Bad: Rare as hen's teeth, flimsy, rusty and ugly
Good: Great performance and roadholding without too much loss of ride quality
Bad: Rare, parts availability, hidden corrosion issues, engines still in demand from 205GTI owners
Good: We're struggling with this one
Bad: Interesting twin-pots were never sold in the UK
Good: Light and efficient, brilliant diesels, all are economical
Bad: Lightweight build can be mistaken for shoddy quality
Good: Brilliant to drive, huge amounts of fun, great handling and fast with a mere 85bhp
Bad: Fragile and far from reliable
Good: Roomy, comfortable and clever
Bad: They don't respond well to abuse and neglect
Good: Dirt cheap to buy now, superb blend of assured handling and comfortable ride, Volcane and Furio versions are brilliant hot hatchbacks
Bad: Limited luggage space, mechanical problems persist, can be hard to resell
Good: Good value and one of Citroen's most reliable cars. VTS is quick, the 1.1 very economical.
Bad: Offset driving position and narrow driver's footwell. Poor crash test rating. Fared badly in JD Power Customer Satisfaction surveys.
Good: Cheap to buy, height-adjustable suspension delivers a smooth ride and safe handling, good rear legroom, distinctive looks.
Bad: Care needed to find a good one these days, a wide range of potential reliability problems.
Good: Seats up to eight. Sliding doors give easy access to the airy, well-designed cabin. Frugal 110bhp HDI diesel.
Bad: Many have led a hard life. Not as enjoyable to drive as a Galaxy, Alhambra or Sharan. Some mechanical problems.
Good: Quirky looks and the versatility to swap from coupe to cabrio, full convertible or pick-up. Roomy for four adults. Four-star crash test rating.
Bad: Many reports of leaks and build quality problems. You'll have to put up with rattles.
Good: Cheap to buy, spacious cabin with three full size seats across the back, comfortable cruiser, aerodynamic shape means 1.6 HDi can do 55mpg.
Bad: Some quality problems. Not as good to drive as the Xsara on which it is based. DMFs can give trouble of 1.6 HDi, but were not fitted to 2.0 HDi.

Compare classic car insurance quotes and buy online. A friendly service offering access to a range of policies and benefits.

Get a quote