Quantcast
WIN: A bundle of Christmas prizes, worth more than £1500 Click here to enter today  | No thanks

Top 10: Surprising classics of the 1990s

With the latest data suggesting that pre-2000 cars are often better maintained than later models, achieving higher MoT pass rates as a result, is it true that models of the ’90s are among today’s best buys? We reckon so.

Not everything built in the 1990s was brilliant, of course. But even among the mainstream models that many thought would never be considered classics, there’s now growing interest from bargain-seeking enthusiasts. Check out our ten most unlikely classics from that decade.

Read more

1
Next

Ford Mondeo – 1992-2000

At the start of the ’90s, sales reps drove around in family-size saloons and hatches made by mass-market companies – with Ford being the market leader. The new Mondeo offered front-wheel drive, superb handling, a wide range of engines and plenty of trim options, inevitably becoming another best-seller for the Blue Oval. By the end of the decade, every British street seemed to have a handful of Mondeos parked in it; but 25 years on from its launch, any early Mondeo is a fairly rare sight. Grab one while they’re still cheap! 

Read our Ford Mondeo MkI review here

Comments

   on 1 December 2017

golf mk3, but not peugeot 306. if it was either 306 or zx, then it had to be 306, for better looks if nothing else

   on 2 December 2017

I'm looking forward to a long future with my collection off mk2 Ghia X mondeo's. Just about every luxury that was on offer is used to give fantastic comfort and a lovely drive. I use one off my auto 2.0l silver top models everyday and its a joy. I'm hoping to save at least one 1997 launch spec model as a future classic. I also have a 2000 version sat awaiting a restoration. Ill be be using the auto daily for as long as im able to as so happy with everything about these cars.

Captain-Cretin    6 days ago

A few years ago, I bought my son a mint condition 98 Skoda to learn in, and was devastated when he wrecked it, hooning around in the snow.

They are big on the inside, even for the big 'n tall, cheap to run - I got 49mpg from the little 1.3l engine; an engine that was also surprisingly nippy due to the light weight, and the engines low range grunt.

Slobodan    6 days ago

All death-boxes. Please buy a modern, safe car. If you get hit in this cans, you will not go well.

Husbandofstinky    yesterday

I could relate to a lot of the above.

For starters, where was the 306? Plenty of them still kicking about and didn't rot. Low tech and easily fixable. I have had many over the years and one up until four years ago when I gave it to father. He still has it and it is still going strong now (2.0 HDi).

I thought about the retro route also but as the last post points out they aren't that solid. If push comes to shove I would much rather be in a modern car rather than a retro wagon in an accident. As great 306's were in a pile up I would put my life and faith in a newish Fiesta/Corsa any day of the week. Pretty light weight stuff back then.

Derek Maddock    yesterday

I have just sold my Rover 75 Club SE 2.0L V6 Which is in the class of the Rover 25. I am regretting selling it already.
It is still a car of distinction and got plenty of second looks in town. It's sleek lines have often been compared to a Jaguar. I have owned a Jaguar X Type and while the engine of the Jag is better, I couldn't help feeling more cosseted in the Rover.

The paintwork on my Rover seemed thicker and was more resistant to stone chips and boy does it polish up. The bodywork on my Rover had no rust, nor did the chrome, the chassis was also rust free.

I felt safe in the car, as safe as I do in a new car and I have had new cars for the last 16 years but only had them for 3 years at a time. Why? , new cars are boring.

Add a comment

 

Ask Honest John