Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Saab Reviews

Swedish aeronautics company Svenska Aeroplan Aktiebolaget began building cars in 1949 in response to the need to diversify away from aircraft manufacture. It went under the acronym SAAB and soon established itself as a maker of innovative cars, thanks to the splash made by the UR-SAAB, the 92. This car made great use of aviation principles in its design and was very advanced for its era.

Subsequent developments built on the foundations of the 92 and kept much of its styling, up until the 1968 launch of the 99, which in turn grew into the 900. These cars brought Saab much acclaim thanks to their innovative use of turbocharging - but also little profit. Following the firm's 1980s partnership with Fiat General Motors took over in 1989, unfortunately managing to destroy much of Saab’s quirky character in the following years. The company ended up by Spyker after GM pulled out, and ceased car manufacure in 2011.

96 two-stroke (1960 - 1968)

Good: Superb roadholding and charismatic two-stroke rasp

Bad: Busy at speed

95 and 95 V4 (1959 - 1978)

Good: More power and performance than the two-stroke

Bad: ...but less refinement

96 V4 (1967 - 1980)

Good: Great styling, excellent dynamics and performance for its engine capacity

Bad: Freewheel is a bit disconcerting to the unintiated, V4 is rough

99 (1965 - 1984)

Good: Quirky, solid, rational and interesting saloon

Bad: Heavy to drive without PAS, tricky to repair structural corrosion

99 Turbo (1978 - 1981)

Good: Turbo punch, excellent roadholding, chunky looks

Bad: Getting rare now

900 (1979 - 1993)

Good: Tough mechanicals, great build quality, superb seating and interior

Bad: Hidden and structural rust now a major concern

900 Turbo (1979 - 1993)

Good: Quirky styling, smooth punchy performance, exceptional build quality, happily used all year round, cheap parts and good specialist back-up

Bad: They can rot savagely in some pretty inaccessible places

9000 (1985 - 1998)

Good: Roomy, well-made, refined, fast in 2.3-litre turbo form

Bad: Expensive repairs rendered far too many to the scrap yard

9-3 (1998 - 2002)

Good: A slightly better drive than previous Cavalier based 900. Stacks of safety kit and a good reliability record.

Bad: Reports of bulkheads fracturing. Diesels can be heavy on the oil. Convertible suffers from scuttle shake.

900 (1993 - 1998)

Good: Practical hatch with a large boot and first-class safety features.

Bad: Problem with cracked bulkheads. Disappointingly soggy to drive. Saab 4-cylinder engines should have an oil change every 5k miles.

Ask Honest John