Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Citroen Dyane MOT Results

65.6% pass rate
from 125 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen Dyane is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 4.8% fail on Individual direction indicators (190% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 4.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 4.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.6% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.80% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.80% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.80% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.80% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 9.6% fail on Suspension
    • 3.2% fail on Axles (8 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on King pins (25 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Axle
    • 3.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.80% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.80% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 8.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.6% fail on Transmission
      • 1.6% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.6% fail on Joints
    • 1.6% fail on Body (6 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Panel (15 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Doors
      • 1.6% fail on Front passenger's door (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Door condition (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.80% fail on Door condition
    • 0.80% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.80% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.80% fail on Chassis
      • 0.80% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.80% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.80% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.80% fail on Pipe
  • 7.2% fail on Brakes
    • 6.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.8% fail on Rbt
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.80% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.80% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.80% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 0.80% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.80% fail on Lever
    • 0.80% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.80% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 4.0% fail on Visibility
    • 3.2% fail on Washers
    • 1.6% fail on Wipers
  • 4.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 4.0% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.80% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.80% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 1.6% fail on Steering
    • 1.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.6% fail on Track rod end
  • 1.6% fail on Tyres
    • 1.6% fail on Tread depth
  • 0.80% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.80% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review