Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Toyota Celica MOT Results

66.3% pass rate
from 406 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Celica is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.2% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.74% fail on Rear lamps
    • 3.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.2% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.74% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.25% fail on Switch
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.74% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.49% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (69 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.25% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.25% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.25% fail on Dipswitch
    • 2.2% fail on Battery
    • 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.74% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.74% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.25% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.25% fail on Switch
    • 0.99% fail on Horn
    • 0.49% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.25% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 14% fail on Suspension (42% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 4.7% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.99% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.74% fail on Spring mounting
    • 4.4% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Front drive shafts (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Constant velocity joints (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Couplings (30 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.25% fail on Drive shafts
    • 2.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.25% fail on Attachment
    • 0.74% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.74% fail on Location (6 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.74% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.74% fail on Macpherson strut (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.74% fail on Condition
    • 0.49% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.49% fail on Front
    • 0.25% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.25% fail on Condition
    • 0.25% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 7.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.4% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.2% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.49% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.25% fail on Brake operation
    • 5.7% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 3.4% fail on Components
        • 2.5% fail on Pipes
        • 1.2% fail on Hoses
      • 1.2% fail on Operation (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Leaks
      • 0.49% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Hub components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake pads (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.25% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.74% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.49% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.49% fail on Condition
    • 0.25% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.25% fail on Pedal
        • 0.25% fail on Condition
    • 0.25% fail on ABS
  • 8.1% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.7% fail on Washers
    • 3.7% fail on Wipers
  • 5.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (160% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Seat belts (160% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Prescribed areas (200% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Requirements (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Condition
  • 5.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.5% fail on Emissions
    • 0.74% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.25% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.25% fail on Pipe
  • 4.4% fail on Steering
    • 3.2% fail on Steering system
      • 1.7% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.74% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.25% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.25% fail on Other components
        • 0.25% fail on Steering component
    • 0.74% fail on Power steering
      • 0.49% fail on Pump (11 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Other components
    • 0.49% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.25% fail on Steering operation
  • 3.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.7% fail on Body condition
    • 1.2% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.2% fail on Chassis
    • 0.74% fail on Seats
      • 0.49% fail on Drivers
      • 0.25% fail on Passengers
    • 0.25% fail on Speedometer
  • 3.0% fail on Tyres
    • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.25% fail on Valve stem
  • 0.99% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.99% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.25% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.25% fail on Attachment