MOT Results

Honest John Classics MOT Results » Jaguar » XK
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Jaguar XK MOT Results

85.0% pass rate
from 280 tests in 2020
(48% better than other pre-1990 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar XK is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.9% fail on Brakes
    • 7.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (120% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 5.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (110% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.71% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 2.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.36% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.8% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
          • 0.36% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.36% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
    • 1.4% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.71% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.36% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.36% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.36% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.36% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.36% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.36% fail on Brake pads
  • 7.1% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (47% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.71% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.4% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.4% fail on Horn
    • 1.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.71% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.71% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.36% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 5.4% fail on Visibility
    • 4.3% fail on Washers
    • 1.8% fail on Wipers
  • 2.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure (58% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Seats
      • 1.1% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.71% fail on Doors
      • 0.71% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.71% fail on Door condition
      • 0.36% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.36% fail on Door condition
    • 0.36% fail on Chassis
      • 0.36% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.36% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.36% fail on Pipe
    • 0.36% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.36% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 1.8% fail on Steering
    • 0.71% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.71% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.71% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.36% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.36% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.36% fail on Intermediate drop arm
    • 0.36% fail on Steering column
    • 0.36% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.36% fail on Flexible coupling
  • 1.4% fail on Suspension (82% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.71% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.36% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 0.36% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.36% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.36% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.36% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review