MOT Results

Honest John Classics MOT Results » Vauxhall » Victor
Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Vauxhall Victor MOT Results

74.8% pass rate
from 282 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Victor is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 9.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.6% fail on Front wheels
      • 3.5% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.8% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.1% fail on Brake imbalance (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Service brake performance
    • 4.6% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 3.9% fail on Components
        • 2.8% fail on Pipes
        • 2.1% fail on Hoses
      • 0.35% fail on Operation
      • 0.35% fail on Leaks
    • 1.1% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.35% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.35% fail on Condition
    • 0.35% fail on Hub components
      • 0.35% fail on Brake drums
  • 11% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (35% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.2% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.35% fail on Tell tales
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.35% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.35% fail on Dipswitch
    • 2.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Battery
    • 0.71% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.35% fail on Lamp
      • 0.35% fail on Switch
    • 0.71% fail on Horn
    • 0.35% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 9.2% fail on Suspension
    • 5.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.8% fail on Component mounting
      • 2.1% fail on Spring mounting
      • 1.1% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 2.1% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.1% fail on Front
    • 1.8% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.71% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.71% fail on Condition
    • 0.35% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.35% fail on Condition
    • 0.35% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.35% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.35% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.35% fail on Condition
  • 6.0% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.0% fail on Washers
    • 1.1% fail on Wipers
    • 0.35% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.5% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.1% fail on System
      • 0.71% fail on Hose (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Cap
      • 0.35% fail on Pipe
  • 3.9% fail on Steering
    • 2.8% fail on Steering system
      • 1.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.71% fail on Free play
        • 0.71% fail on Steering box (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.35% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.35% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.35% fail on Other components
        • 0.35% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.71% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.35% fail on Steering control
      • 0.35% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.35% fail on Flexible coupling
  • 2.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.1% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.1% fail on Chassis
    • 1.1% fail on Body condition
    • 0.35% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.35% fail on Doors
      • 0.35% fail on Passengers other
  • 1.8% fail on Tyres
    • 1.8% fail on Condition
  • 1.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.71% fail on Registration plate
    • 0.35% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.71% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.71% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.35% fail on Condition
      • 0.35% fail on Prescribed areas
Read the Honest John Review