MOT Results

Honest John Classics MOT Results » Lancia » Fulvia
Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Lancia Fulvia MOT Results

74.7% pass rate
from 332 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Lancia Fulvia is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.3% fail on Direction indicators (85% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Flashing type (85% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 3.9% fail on Individual lamps (130% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.60% fail on Tell tales
        • 0.60% fail on Switch
    • 5.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.90% fail on Switch (7 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Horn
    • 2.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Battery
    • 1.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.60% fail on Front lamps
    • 0.90% fail on Registration plate lamp
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 9.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.2% fail on Front wheels
      • 3.3% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.3% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.60% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 3.9% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 2.7% fail on Components
        • 1.8% fail on Hoses
        • 0.60% fail on Pipes
        • 0.30% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.30% fail on Valves
      • 1.2% fail on Leaks
      • 0.60% fail on Operation
    • 0.90% fail on Hub components
      • 0.60% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.30% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.60% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.60% fail on Condition
    • 0.30% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.30% fail on Pedal
        • 0.30% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.30% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.30% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.30% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 3.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.1% fail on Spring mounting
      • 2.1% fail on Subframe mounting (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Component mounting
    • 3.6% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Front drive shafts (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.30% fail on Drive shafts
    • 2.7% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.1% fail on Front
      • 0.60% fail on Rear
    • 1.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.90% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.90% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.60% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.60% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.30% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.30% fail on Securing bolts
    • 0.30% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 7.5% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.90% fail on Wipers
  • 3.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.2% fail on Body condition
    • 0.60% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.60% fail on Chassis
    • 0.60% fail on Doors
      • 0.60% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.60% fail on Seats
      • 0.60% fail on Drivers
    • 0.30% fail on Engine mountings
  • 2.7% fail on Steering
    • 1.8% fail on Steering system
      • 0.60% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.60% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.60% fail on Other components
        • 0.60% fail on Steering pivot point
      • 0.30% fail on Free play
        • 0.30% fail on Steering box
    • 0.60% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.30% fail on Steering control
      • 0.30% fail on Steering column
  • 2.7% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 1.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.60% fail on Emissions
    • 0.60% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.60% fail on Tank
  • 1.2% fail on Tyres
    • 0.60% fail on Condition
    • 0.60% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review