Do you want the Road Tax system to change? Do you have thoughts on the potential changes to the Road Tax system? | No thanks
Jaguar S-Type MOT Results
76.4% pass rate
from 225 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar S-Type is unusually good or bad.
-
12% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
-
3.6% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp
-
0.44% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.44% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
-
2.7% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.3% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.89% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.44% fail on Tell tales
-
2.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.2% fail on Horn
- 1.8% fail on Stop lamp
- 1.3% fail on Battery
-
1.3% fail on
Position lamps
- 1.3% fail on Front lamps
- 0.89% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 0.44% fail on Electrical wiring
-
11% fail on
Brakes
-
8.9% fail on
Brake performance
- 3.1% fail on Rear wheels
- 3.1% fail on Parking brake performance
- 2.7% fail on Front wheels
- 0.44% fail on Gradient hand brake
- 0.44% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.44% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
2.2% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
1.3% fail on
Components
- 0.89% fail on Hoses
- 0.44% fail on Valves
- 0.44% fail on Operation
- 0.44% fail on Leaks
-
1.3% fail on
Components
-
1.8% fail on
Hub components
- 0.89% fail on Brake discs
- 0.89% fail on Brake calipers (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Brake pads
-
0.89% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
(15 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
0.89% fail on
Components
(27 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Servos (34 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
0.89% fail on
Components
(27 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Brake performance
-
7.6% fail on
Suspension
- 2.2% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.8% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.44% fail on Attachment
-
1.3% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.89% fail on Subframe mounting
- 0.44% fail on Component mounting
-
0.89% fail on
Trailing arms
(6 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (9 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.44% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.44% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.44% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.44% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.44% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.44% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.44% fail on Rear
-
0.44% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.44% fail on Condition
-
0.44% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.44% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.44% fail on Universal joint
-
0.44% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
-
5.8% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.4% fail on Washers
- 1.3% fail on Wipers
-
4.4% fail on
Steering
-
3.1% fail on
Steering system
- 1.8% fail on Track rod end
- 1.3% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Other components
- 0.44% fail on Steering pivot point
-
0.89% fail on
Steering control
- 0.44% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.44% fail on Steering column
-
0.44% fail on
Power steering
- 0.44% fail on Operation
- 0.44% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
3.1% fail on
Steering system
-
2.2% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
-
2.2% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.8% fail on System (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Cap
-
2.2% fail on
Fuel system
-
1.8% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.89% fail on Body condition
-
0.44% fail on
Doors
- 0.44% fail on Passengers front
-
0.44% fail on
Seats
- 0.44% fail on Drivers
-
1.3% fail on
Tyres
- 1.3% fail on Tread depth
-
0.44% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.44% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.44% fail on Attachment
-
0.44% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.44% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.44% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review