MOT Results

Honest John Classics MOT Results » Ford » Mustang

Ford Mustang MOT Results

79.6% pass rate
from 186 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Mustang is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.5% fail on Direction indicators (170% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Flashing type (170% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 5.9% fail on Individual direction indicators (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.54% fail on Side repeaters
    • 5.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.8% fail on Electrical equipment (170% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Horn
      • 1.6% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 1.1% fail on Electrical wiring (7 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.54% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.54% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.54% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.54% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.54% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.54% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 10% fail on Visibility
    • 9.1% fail on Washers (110% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Wipers
  • 9.1% fail on Brakes
    • 7.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.54% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 4.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.8% fail on Rbt
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.54% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.54% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.54% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.54% fail on Pedal
    • 0.54% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.54% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.54% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.54% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.54% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.54% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.54% fail on Brake pads
  • 6.5% fail on Steering
    • 3.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.1% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.54% fail on Other components
        • 0.54% fail on Steering component
    • 1.1% fail on Steering wheel (8 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Power steering
      • 0.54% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.54% fail on Steering column
    • 0.54% fail on Steering play
      • 0.54% fail on Steering box
  • 5.9% fail on Suspension
    • 3.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.2% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.54% fail on Axles
      • 0.54% fail on Axle
    • 0.54% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.54% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.54% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.54% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.54% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.54% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.54% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 4.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.1% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.54% fail on Tank
      • 0.54% fail on Pipe
    • 1.6% fail on Seats
      • 1.6% fail on Driver's seat
      • 1.6% fail on Passenger's seat (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Chassis
      • 1.1% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.54% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.54% fail on Engine mounting condition
  • 3.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.7% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.7% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.54% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.54% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.54% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 1.6% fail on Tyres
    • 1.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.54% fail on Condition
  • 0.54% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.54% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.54% fail on Condition
  • 0.54% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.54% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review