Is the dealer liable for a cam belt failure eight months after purchase?

On the 23 October 2009 I purchased for my daughter a used car with 67,000 miles on the clock for £2200, but she did not use it until disposing of her existing car in January 2010. In May 2010, with only an additional 1050 miles on the clock, the timing belt failed and the RAC recovered the vehicle to a local garage with the resulting damage costing £1700. The original dealer declined any contribution as he had stamped 'trade sale' on the invoice when she signed it and he would only have provided six month guarantee in any event. When she questioned this additional 'Trade Sale' stamp he explained that it was because he was selling the car at trade price instead of 'through the trade because it was in such good condition'.

Local Trading Standards advised that whilst they may discuss the Trade Sale' issue, the fault arose too long after purchase for me to have any claim against the dealer, as the low mileage was not relevant. Do you agree this to be the case?

Asked on 15 August 2010 by atrik

Answered by Honest John
Yes. The problem occurred too late after purchase for the dealer to be held liable.
Similar questions
I can't afford the £1400 quoted for fixing my 2007 Citroen C4 after the cam belt snapped. Garage said they would have to send head off to check damage first. Is it worth me buying a new head myself and...
I bought an old motorhome last August and the dealer did quite a bit of work on it prior to collection. He paid for a service and cam belt change at his usual local garage. However, the cam belt tensioner...
I bought a manual Volkswagen Golf R 2016 at 7500 miles in September this year. I'm the second owner. The clutch has started to slip when going through the gears, but doesn't always do it. The car is with...