Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Why are pre-1960 cars to be MoT-exempt?

It has come to my attention that, from 18 November 2013, pre-1960 cars no longer need an MoT. This seems to me to be ridiculous. Surely the age of these cars indicates they are at least, if not more likely to develop faults that are dangerous to the driver, and others.

Asked on 19 January 2013 by IS, via email

Answered by Honest John
Actually, no. The age of more than 50 years old generally indicates that these cars are in the hands of enthusiasts who look after them a lot better than the general public does of five-year-old cars. And they are driven far less frequently.

The evidence is in our MoT reports that uniquely analyse the results of 30,000,000 MoT tests a year: good-garage-guide.honestjohn.co.uk/mot-data-the-mo.../
Similar questions
My 1975 MGB GT has been off the road since at least 2006. Having renewed and rebuilt the brakes and suspension, does it need an MoT before driving on the road?
I have a 2001 Mazda MX5 1.8 with around 70,000 miles on the clock. It will probably fail its next MoT. Even though the engine and gearbox are still top notch, the cost of essential repairs (including exhaust/cat...
My Volkswagen T2 has become an historic vehicle and is registered as such on the V5C. Because I was/am registered for MoT reminders from DVLA I have been sent a reminder for the MoT, due this month. It...
 

Ask Honest John