Fuel consumption on a Kia

Please note the 67.3 mpg combined you show and Kia show in the information for this model I believe is not attainable in normal driving if there is such a thing.

I did a test as recommended by the garage who sold me my car a main dealer to simulate a combined drive of length 60 miles and the garage repeated the test in my car.

The figure achieved was 20 miles lower than the published figures.

Now as I made a decision to purchase based on the advertised figures and no doubt others have also done the same am I unlucky or is my experience relatively typical and published mpg figures have to be downrated by at least 25% to get nearer to a typical figure attainable.

Asked on 7 January 2012 by mpgquery

Answered by Honest John
The Real Life Fuel Economy Register at www.honestjohn.co.uk shows 48mpg for the 1.0 without a/c, 46.5mpg for the 1.0 with a/c and a surprising 52.7mpg for the 1.25 EcoDynamics ISG. The whole point of the Real Life Fuel Economy Register is to show real drivers what they are really likely to get. The EC Certification tests do not do this.
Similar questions
I have a Jaguar XE, nearly two years old, which averages around 39mpg on the computer set for long periods. 2000 miles ago I decided to check real mpg by checking fill-ups against mileage and was surprised...
You mention that supermarket petrol can clog up engines and reduce MPG from the deposits in their additives. I understand that it's best to use branded super unleaded. Is it the case that branded normal...
I recently purchased a 2015 Vauxhall Astra diesel 1.6 CDTi, attracted by the high quoted MPG of 76 (combined). I always calculate the cars MPG when I fill up, as well as recording the figure the car says....
Related models
Excellent small car for the money. High quality and neatly designed interior. Great to drive and cheap to run.
 

Value my car

Save £75 on Warranty using code HJ75

with MotorEasy

Get a warranty quote

Save 12% on GAP Insurance

Use HJ21 to save on an ALA policy

See offer