Should Honda have replaced these parts?

Our four year old Honda Jazz, bought 12 months ago as approved used, passed its MOT and on the same day Honda carried out a short service and safety check.

They gave a red alert on the corroded brake pipes and lower suspension arm yet it had only done 6K miles since we bought it.t Total mileage of 20K.

We complained and the garage agreed to replace the brake pipes FOC ang give us a 10% discount for the arms, leaving us a £600 bill.

I asked to see the failed items and the flexibles only had surface corrosion, no deep pits on the ferrules, and the rubber bushes looked OK as well.

Surely they should have been found on their multipoint inspection for an approved car if they are as bad as they claim now. Who can I get an opinion from on their condition as Honda will not get involved?

Asked on 7 November 2011 by BNG

Answered by Honest John
If the brake pipes have been replaced FOC then why worry? Or is your dispute over the suspension arms? It's the first I've heard of this particular failure.
Similar questions
I am 73 and considering buying a used Mercedes C Class estate as the car that will 'see me out'. I am prepared to pay a premium for what I hope will be a degree of assurance on its longevity and I'm not...
For the last few years of my working life I need very reliable car for my daily commute. I'm in the market for a new car, with a budget of up £15K. Of the two car manufacturers, who offer a seven year...
I purchased a used 67 plate SsangYong Turismo from a main dealer under their 'approved used' scheme. I also purchased their own extended warranty which is on top of the three month one they offer. This...
Related models
Clever interior redefined the small car. Most space efficient small car built. Very reliable first 3 - 4 years.
 

Value my car

Save £75 on Warranty using code HJ75

with MotorEasy

Get a warranty quote

Save 12% on GAP Insurance

Use HJ21 to save on an ALA policy

See offer