Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Triumph TR6 MOT Results

81.0% pass rate
from 1,528 tests in 2020
(30% better than other pre-1990 cars)
Number of tests by age
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Triumph TR6 is unusually good or bad.

  • 8.8% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (35% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.59% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim (35% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.065% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.1% fail on Horn
      • 0.065% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.065% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps (42% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp (46% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Dipswitch
    • 0.92% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.59% fail on Position lamp (59% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.65% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (53% better than other pre-1990 cars)
  • 5.7% fail on Brakes (40% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Brake performance (29% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.065% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.85% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.065% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.065% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.92% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt
          • 0.65% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.39% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 0.26% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.20% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.065% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.13% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.13% fail on Pedal
    • 0.13% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.065% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
      • 0.065% fail on Servos
    • 0.13% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.13% fail on Lever
    • 0.13% fail on Rigid brake pipes (89% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.065% fail on Other components
      • 0.065% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.065% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.065% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.065% fail on Servos
  • 5.7% fail on Visibility
    • 4.4% fail on Washers
    • 2.1% fail on Wipers
  • 4.8% fail on Suspension (41% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.39% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint (80% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.065% fail on Suspension arm
    • 1.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (66% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.39% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.20% fail on Linkage
      • 0.065% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.065% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.065% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.26% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.13% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.065% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.20% fail on Springs (73% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.20% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.065% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.065% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.065% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.065% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 3.5% fail on Steering
    • 1.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.20% fail on Other components
        • 0.20% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.13% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.065% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.1% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.1% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.65% fail on Steering column (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.065% fail on Flexible coupling
      • 0.065% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.065% fail on Power steering
      • 0.065% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.065% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.065% fail on Steering shaft
    • 0.065% fail on Steering play
      • 0.065% fail on Steering rack
  • 2.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure (64% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.39% fail on Pipe
      • 0.13% fail on System
      • 0.065% fail on Hose
    • 0.46% fail on Exhaust system (77% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Seats
      • 0.39% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.26% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.39% fail on Transmission (71% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Drive shafts (63% better than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Joints (68% better than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.065% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.065% fail on Halfshafts
    • 0.26% fail on Integral vehicle structure (74% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (73% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Chassis (88% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Chassis condition (87% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Body
      • 0.065% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.065% fail on Other body component
    • 0.13% fail on Doors
      • 0.065% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.065% fail on Door condition
      • 0.065% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.065% fail on Door condition
    • 0.065% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.065% fail on Spare wheel condition
  • 0.72% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (83% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Exhaust emissions (89% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Spark ignition (88% better than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Non catalyst emissions (88% better than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.065% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.33% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.20% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.065% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.065% fail on Other leaks
  • 0.52% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (70% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Seat belts (70% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Prescribed areas (83% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Condition
      • 0.065% fail on Attachment
      • 0.065% fail on Requirements
  • 0.39% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.39% fail on Attachment
  • 0.39% fail on Tyres (75% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Condition
    • 0.065% fail on Tread depth
  • 0.33% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.33% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.065% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.065% fail on Speedometer
Read the Honest John Review