Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Triumph Acclaim MOT Results

67.1% pass rate
from 161 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Triumph Acclaim is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.62% fail on Springs
      • 0.62% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.62% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.62% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.62% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.62% fail on Ball joint
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.9% fail on Chassis
      • 1.2% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.62% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 1.2% fail on Doors
      • 0.62% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.62% fail on Door condition
      • 0.62% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.62% fail on Door condition
    • 0.62% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.62% fail on Transmission
      • 0.62% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.62% fail on Joints
    • 0.62% fail on Floor
  • 9.9% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.62% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.2% fail on Horn
    • 0.62% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.62% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.62% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.62% fail on Position lamp
  • 9.3% fail on Brakes
    • 7.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.3% fail on Rbt
          • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.62% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.62% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.62% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 0.62% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.62% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.62% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.62% fail on Lever
    • 0.62% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.62% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.62% fail on Brake pads
  • 5.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.6% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.5% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 2.5% fail on Emissions not tested (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.62% fail on Catalyst emissions
  • 3.1% fail on Visibility
    • 1.9% fail on Washers
    • 1.2% fail on Wipers
  • 3.1% fail on Tyres
    • 1.2% fail on Size/type (12 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.62% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.62% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.62% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review