MOT Results

Honest John Classics MOT Results » Triumph » 2000
Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Triumph 2000 MOT Results

74.9% pass rate
from 450 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Triumph 2000 is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 9.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.6% fail on Rear wheels
      • 4.4% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.8% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.67% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.67% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.67% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 2.0% fail on Components
        • 1.1% fail on Pipes
        • 0.67% fail on Hoses
        • 0.22% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.22% fail on Operation
      • 0.22% fail on Leaks
    • 0.89% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.67% fail on Mechanical components (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Cable
      • 0.22% fail on Clevis joint
    • 0.44% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.44% fail on Condition
    • 0.44% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.22% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
      • 0.22% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.22% fail on Hub components
      • 0.22% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.22% fail on Locking devices
  • 12% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (30% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.44% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.44% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.22% fail on Switch
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.89% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.89% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.22% fail on Tell tales
    • 1.1% fail on Position lamps (69% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.44% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.22% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.89% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 0.67% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.67% fail on Lamp
    • 0.44% fail on Battery
    • 0.44% fail on Horn (78% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.22% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.22% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 8.9% fail on Suspension
    • 4.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 3.3% fail on Component mounting
      • 1.8% fail on Subframe mounting (180% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Spring mounting
    • 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.3% fail on Front
      • 0.67% fail on Rear
    • 1.3% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.89% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.89% fail on Condition
    • 0.44% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.44% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.44% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.44% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.44% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.22% fail on Condition
      • 0.22% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment
    • 0.22% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.22% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.22% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.22% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.22% fail on Drive shafts
  • 6.9% fail on Steering
    • 5.6% fail on Steering system
      • 2.9% fail on Steering rack (140% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.44% fail on Free play
        • 0.44% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.22% fail on Steering box
      • 0.22% fail on Steering arm
    • 1.6% fail on Steering control (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Steering coupling (7 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.44% fail on Flexible coupling (13 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.44% fail on Universal joint
      • 0.67% fail on Steering column
    • 0.44% fail on Power steering
      • 0.22% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.22% fail on Other components
    • 0.22% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.22% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 3.8% fail on Driver's view of the road (47% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.22% fail on Wipers
  • 2.9% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (50% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.89% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.44% fail on Pipe
      • 0.22% fail on Tank
      • 0.22% fail on System
    • 0.44% fail on Emissions (82% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 2.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.3% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.3% fail on Chassis
    • 0.44% fail on Body condition
    • 0.44% fail on Doors
      • 0.44% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.22% fail on Seats
      • 0.22% fail on Drivers
  • 2.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.22% fail on Condition
  • 1.3% fail on Tyres
    • 0.67% fail on Condition
    • 0.67% fail on Tread depth
Read the Honest John Review