MOT Results

Honest John Classics MOT Results » Suzuki » Super Carry
Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Suzuki Super Carry MOT Results

52.6% pass rate
from 78 tests in 2020
(71% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Super Carry is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (80% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 10% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 10% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 10% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 5.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.8% fail on Position lamp
      • 1.3% fail on Switch
    • 5.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 5.1% fail on Horn
      • 1.3% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 3.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.3% fail on All direction indicators
        • 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.3% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.3% fail on Hazard warning
      • 1.3% fail on Switch
  • 21% fail on Brakes (110% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 19% fail on Brake performance (170% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 13% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 13% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
          • 13% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
          • 3.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 10% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 10% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
          • 7.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.6% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt
          • 2.6% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 3.8% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (17 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Prescribed areas (21 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
        • 1.3% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
        • 1.3% fail on Other braking system component
    • 1.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 7.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.8% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.3% fail on Springs
      • 1.3% fail on Leaf springs
        • 1.3% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.3% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.3% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 13% fail on Visibility
    • 6.4% fail on Wipers
    • 6.4% fail on Washers
    • 1.3% fail on View to rear
      • 1.3% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.4% fail on Spark ignition
        • 6.4% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 1.3% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.3% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 6.4% fail on Steering
    • 3.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.3% fail on Intermediate drop arm
      • 1.3% fail on Steering arm
    • 2.6% fail on Steering gear
      • 2.6% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.3% fail on Steering coupling
      • 1.3% fail on Universal joint
  • 6.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.6% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Attachment
  • 5.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.3% fail on Floor
  • 5.1% fail on Tyres
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Size/type
    • 1.3% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.3% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plates