Do you want the Road Tax system to change? Do you have thoughts on the potential changes to the Road Tax system? | No thanks
Suzuki Super Carry MOT Results
59.2% pass rate
from 71 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Super Carry is unusually good or bad.
-
18% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 5.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
4.2% fail on
Position lamps
- 2.8% fail on Front lamps
- 1.4% fail on All position lamps
-
4.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 4.2% fail on Fog lamp
- 4.2% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.2% fail on
Direction indicators
-
4.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 4.2% fail on Individual lamps
-
4.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 4.2% fail on Horn
-
2.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.8% fail on Headlamp
- 1.4% fail on Battery
- 1.4% fail on Electrical wiring
-
17% fail on
Brakes
-
9.9% fail on
Brake performance
- 4.2% fail on Front wheels
- 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
- 2.8% fail on Rear wheels
- 1.4% fail on Brake imbalance
-
8.5% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
8.5% fail on
Components
(2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Pipes
- 4.2% fail on Hoses
-
8.5% fail on
Components
(2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Parking brake
(4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Hub components
- 1.4% fail on Brake pads
-
9.9% fail on
Brake performance
-
11% fail on
Suspension
-
7.0% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 4.2% fail on Spring mounting (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Component mounting
-
1.4% fail on
Leaf springs
-
1.4% fail on
Pins and bushes
- 1.4% fail on Shackle
-
1.4% fail on
Pins and bushes
-
1.4% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.4% fail on Condition
-
1.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.4% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.4% fail on Front
-
1.4% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.4% fail on Condition
-
7.0% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
8.5% fail on
Steering
-
8.5% fail on
Steering system
-
2.8% fail on
Free play
(11 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Steering box
- 1.4% fail on Steering rack
- 2.8% fail on Steering rack
-
2.8% fail on
Other components
(19 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Steering pivot point (24 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Track rod end
-
2.8% fail on
Free play
(11 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Steering control
- 1.4% fail on Steering column
- 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
-
8.5% fail on
Steering system
-
7.0% fail on
Tyres
- 5.6% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Size/type
- 1.4% fail on Tread depth
-
7.0% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 2.8% fail on Body condition
-
2.8% fail on
Seats
- 1.4% fail on Passengers
- 1.4% fail on Drivers
-
1.4% fail on
Doors
- 1.4% fail on Passengers front
-
7.0% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 4.2% fail on Exhaust system
- 2.8% fail on Emissions
- 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
-
7.0% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.6% fail on Washers
- 1.4% fail on Wipers
-
1.4% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
1.4% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.4% fail on Condition
-
1.4% fail on
Seat belts