MOT Results

Honest John Classics MOT Results » Suzuki » Super Carry
Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Suzuki Super Carry MOT Results

58.6% pass rate
from 70 tests in 2020
(53% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Super Carry is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Brakes (120% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 16% fail on Brake performance (130% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 8.6% fail on Service brake performance (180% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 8.6% fail on Rbt (190% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
          • 8.6% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 7.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (130% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 7.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (150% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
          • 5.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (170% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (0.87% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (10% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Hand lever (17 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.4% fail on Lever
    • 1.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.4% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (57% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 8.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 8.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 8.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Electrical equipment (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Horn (180% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Battery(ies) (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamps (47% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp (54% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim (27% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim (8.9% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.3% fail on Stop lamp (67% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.4% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 1.4% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 11% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Steering gear (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Prescribed areas (22 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Steering column (21 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.4% fail on Intermediate drop arm
    • 1.4% fail on Steering play
      • 1.4% fail on Steering box
  • 10% fail on Body, chassis, structure (50% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust system (43% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Seats (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Passenger's seat (9 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.4% fail on Chassis
      • 1.4% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.4% fail on Body
      • 1.4% fail on Panel
    • 1.4% fail on Cabs
      • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 10% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (140% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 10% fail on Exhaust emissions (180% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 10% fail on Spark ignition (200% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 8.6% fail on Non catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 8.6% fail on Visibility (37% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 8.6% fail on Washers (100% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Wipers (17% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
  • 8.6% fail on Suspension (9.8% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (140% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Wheel bearings (100% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 4.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (160% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Seat belts (160% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Prescribed areas (170% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
  • 2.9% fail on Tyres (100% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.4% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.4% fail on Attachment