Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks
Nissan Micra MOT Results
59.8% pass rate
from 453 tests in 2021
(48% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
Number of tests by age
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Micra is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
4.6% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.6% fail on Headlamp
-
4.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
4.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.6% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.22% fail on Switch
-
4.4% fail on
Flashing type
-
3.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
-
3.5% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
3.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 3.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.22% fail on Switch
-
3.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
1.5% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.3% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.22% fail on Horn
-
0.66% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.66% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
- 0.22% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.44% fail on Stop lamp (82% better than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.22% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.22% fail on Switch
-
4.6% fail on
Headlamps
-
14% fail on
Suspension
(94% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 9.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Shock absorbers (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings
-
1.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.88% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.44% fail on Ball joint
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.44% fail on
Springs
- 0.44% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.22% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes
-
13% fail on
Brakes
(42% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
10% fail on
Brake performance
(53% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
8.4% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(180% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
8.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(190% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (120% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
8.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(190% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.9% fail on
Rbt
- 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.44% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.9% fail on
Rbt
-
2.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.88% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.88% fail on
Rbt
- 0.88% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.88% fail on
Rbt
-
8.4% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(180% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.66% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.66% fail on Lever
-
0.44% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.44% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.22% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.22% fail on Hand lever
-
0.22% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.22% fail on Master cylinder
-
0.22% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.22% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.22% fail on Brake pads
-
0.22% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
10% fail on
Brake performance
(53% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
12% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(89% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Exhaust system (150% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Transmission
(130% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(170% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Joints (180% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.22% fail on Joints
-
2.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(170% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Chassis
- 1.3% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.88% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.88% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
0.66% fail on
Body
- 0.44% fail on Panel
- 0.22% fail on Other body component
-
0.44% fail on
Engine mounting
(5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Engine mounting condition (6 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Bumpers
- 0.22% fail on Floor
-
0.22% fail on
Seats
- 0.22% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.22% fail on Passenger's seat
-
7.5% fail on
Visibility
- 4.6% fail on Wipers (90% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Washers
-
0.66% fail on
View to rear
(3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Mirrors (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
4.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.6% fail on
Spark ignition
- 3.5% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.44% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
0.44% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.44% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
4.6% fail on
Spark ignition
-
4.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(180% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Seat belts
(180% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Requirements
- 0.22% fail on Condition
-
4.4% fail on
Seat belts
(180% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Tyres
- 1.8% fail on Tread depth (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Condition
- 0.22% fail on Size/type
-
1.3% fail on
Steering
(63% better than other pre-1990 cars)
-
0.88% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.66% fail on Track rod end
- 0.22% fail on Steering arm
-
0.44% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.22% fail on Operation
- 0.22% fail on Steering rack
-
0.88% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.88% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.88% fail on Registration plates
-
0.66% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.44% fail on Attachment
- 0.22% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review