Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Nissan 200SX MOT Results

66.3% pass rate
from 101 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan 200SX is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.0% fail on All position lamps (6 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Rear lamps
    • 6.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 4.0% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.99% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.99% fail on Switch
    • 5.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.0% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.99% fail on Individual lamps
    • 2.0% fail on Battery
    • 2.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.99% fail on Horn
  • 9.9% fail on Suspension
    • 5.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 3.0% fail on Component mounting
      • 3.0% fail on Subframe mounting (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Spring mounting
    • 2.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.99% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.99% fail on Attachment
    • 0.99% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.99% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.99% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.99% fail on Attachment
    • 0.99% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.99% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.99% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.99% fail on Front
    • 0.99% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.99% fail on Condition
  • 9.9% fail on Brakes
    • 5.0% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 4.0% fail on Components
        • 2.0% fail on Pipes
        • 2.0% fail on Hoses
        • 0.99% fail on Reservoirs
      • 2.0% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (15 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.0% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.99% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.99% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.99% fail on Hub components
      • 0.99% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.99% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.99% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.99% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 8.9% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.9% fail on Washers
    • 3.0% fail on Wipers
    • 0.99% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.9% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 3.0% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Attachment
  • 5.9% fail on Steering
    • 4.0% fail on Steering system
      • 2.0% fail on Steering rack
      • 2.0% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.99% fail on Steering control
      • 0.99% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.99% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.99% fail on Power steering
      • 0.99% fail on Drive system
  • 5.9% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 4.0% fail on Body condition
    • 2.0% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.0% fail on Chassis
    • 0.99% fail on Body security
    • 0.99% fail on Doors
      • 0.99% fail on Drivers
  • 5.0% fail on Tyres
    • 4.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.99% fail on Size/type
  • 4.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 2.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.99% fail on Emissions
    • 0.99% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.99% fail on Pipe
  • 2.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review