Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Morris Six MOT Results

73.3% pass rate
from 258 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Morris Six is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 10% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.2% fail on Front wheels
      • 5.0% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.9% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.39% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 5.8% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 3.5% fail on Components
        • 2.3% fail on Pipes
        • 1.2% fail on Hoses
      • 2.3% fail on Leaks (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.39% fail on Pedal
        • 0.39% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.39% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.39% fail on Cable
    • 0.39% fail on Restricted movement
  • 14% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 4.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.6% fail on All direction indicators
        • 1.6% fail on Individual lamps
        • 1.2% fail on Tell tales
    • 3.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.39% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.39% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.39% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 1.9% fail on Horn
    • 0.78% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.78% fail on Rear reflectors (6 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on Headlamp aim (82% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Battery
    • 0.39% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 8.9% fail on Suspension
    • 3.5% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 3.5% fail on Front (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.6% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.39% fail on Spring mounting
    • 1.6% fail on Leaf springs (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Condition
      • 0.39% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.39% fail on Anchor
      • 0.39% fail on Shackle bracket
      • 0.39% fail on Securing bolts
    • 1.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.39% fail on Attachment
    • 1.2% fail on Tie bars/rods (6 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Attachment (22 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.2% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.78% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.78% fail on Condition
    • 0.39% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.39% fail on Attachment
    • 0.39% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 6.2% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers
    • 3.1% fail on Washers
  • 5.4% fail on Steering
    • 5.4% fail on Steering system
      • 4.3% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Track rod end
  • 3.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.39% fail on Condition
  • 2.7% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 1.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.6% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.2% fail on Cap
      • 0.39% fail on Tank
  • 2.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.2% fail on Body condition
    • 0.78% fail on Doors
      • 0.39% fail on Drivers
      • 0.39% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.39% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.39% fail on Chassis
  • 0.39% fail on Tyres
    • 0.39% fail on Tread depth
Read the Honest John Review