Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Morris Six MOT Results

70.4% pass rate
from 108 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Morris Six is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (93% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 10% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 10% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
          • 6.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (6 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
          • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
      • 4.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 4.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 4.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
      • 4.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.9% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 0.93% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.93% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.93% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.93% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.93% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.93% fail on Brake drums
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.93% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.93% fail on Switch
    • 3.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.8% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.93% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.93% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.93% fail on Horn
  • 8.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.7% fail on Fuel system (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (10 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Tank
      • 0.93% fail on Hose
    • 0.93% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.93% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.93% fail on Floor
    • 0.93% fail on Seats
      • 0.93% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.93% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 7.4% fail on Steering
    • 3.7% fail on Steering gear
      • 3.7% fail on Steering rack
    • 3.7% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.8% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.93% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.93% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 5.6% fail on Visibility
    • 3.7% fail on Washers
    • 2.8% fail on Wipers
  • 4.6% fail on Suspension
    • 2.8% fail on Suspension rods (21 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.93% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.93% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.93% fail on Springs
      • 0.93% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.93% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.93% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
    • 0.93% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.93% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.93% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.93% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 3.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.93% fail on Requirements
  • 1.9% fail on Tyres
    • 1.9% fail on Tread depth
Read the Honest John Review