MOT Results

Honest John Classics MOT Results » Lotus » Excel

Lotus Excel MOT Results

80.7% pass rate
from 140 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Lotus Excel is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.9% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.71% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.71% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.71% fail on Switch
    • 0.71% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.71% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.71% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.71% fail on Switch
    • 0.71% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.71% fail on Switch
    • 0.71% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.71% fail on Horn
  • 6.4% fail on Brakes
    • 2.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.71% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.71% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.71% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.71% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.71% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.71% fail on Pedal
    • 0.71% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.71% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.71% fail on Brake pads
  • 6.4% fail on Visibility
    • 3.6% fail on Wipers
    • 3.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.71% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.71% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.7% fail on Steering
    • 3.6% fail on Power steering (9 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Operation (12 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Pipes and hoses (17 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Other components
    • 1.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.71% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.71% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.71% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.71% fail on Steering rack
  • 5.0% fail on Suspension
    • 2.1% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.71% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.71% fail on Springs
      • 0.71% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.71% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.71% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.71% fail on Anti-roll bar
  • 5.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 4.3% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.71% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.71% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 2.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.71% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.71% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.71% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.71% fail on Transmission
      • 0.71% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.71% fail on Joints
    • 0.71% fail on Doors
      • 0.71% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.71% fail on Hinge
  • 0.71% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.71% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.71% fail on Tyres
    • 0.71% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • Lotus Excel 1982 - 1992
    Great handling and ride, excellent performance/economy, much improved quality over earlier cars thanks to some Toyota parts sharing