MOT Results

Honest John Classics MOT Results » Jaguar » XJ6
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Jaguar XJ6 MOT Results

75.1% pass rate
from 903 tests in 2020
Number of tests by age
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar XJ6 is unusually good or bad.

  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.33% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.8% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.7% fail on Horn
      • 1.2% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.11% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 2.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.4% fail on Side repeaters (120% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.22% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.22% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.66% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.44% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (81% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Rear fog lamp (81% better than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.44% fail on Rear fog lamp (81% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.22% fail on Switch
    • 0.22% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.11% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.11% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.11% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 10% fail on Brakes
    • 8.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (87% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 5.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (100% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.44% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.22% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.89% fail on Brake performance not tested (180% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (74% better than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.78% fail on Rbt (sp) (73% better than other pre-1990 cars)
          • 0.55% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake imbalance (89% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.00% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.44% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.44% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.44% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.22% fail on Lever (6 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Cable
        • 0.11% fail on Linkage
      • 0.11% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.11% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.66% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.55% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Anti-lock braking system (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.44% fail on Pedal
    • 0.33% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.22% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.11% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.22% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.22% fail on Lever
    • 0.22% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.22% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.11% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.11% fail on Servos
  • 7.4% fail on Suspension
    • 2.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover (140% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.00% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.78% fail on Ball joint dust cover (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.55% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.55% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.33% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.11% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.11% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.44% fail on Springs
      • 0.33% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.22% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.11% fail on Mounting
      • 0.11% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.11% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 5.4% fail on Visibility
    • 3.8% fail on Washers
    • 2.3% fail on Wipers
    • 0.22% fail on View to rear
      • 0.22% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.11% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.11% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.78% fail on Doors
      • 0.44% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.44% fail on Door condition
      • 0.44% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.44% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
    • 0.66% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.33% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.22% fail on System
      • 0.11% fail on Pipe
    • 0.33% fail on Chassis
      • 0.33% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.22% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.22% fail on Seats
      • 0.22% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.11% fail on Transmission
      • 0.11% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.11% fail on Joints
    • 0.11% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.11% fail on Bracket
    • 0.11% fail on Body
      • 0.11% fail on Body condition
    • 0.11% fail on Floor
    • 0.11% fail on Cabs
      • 0.11% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 3.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.5% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.7% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.89% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.11% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.55% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.55% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.11% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.11% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 3.2% fail on Steering
    • 1.8% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.8% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.4% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Other components (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Pipes and hoses (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Rams (9 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.11% fail on Flexible coupling
      • 0.11% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.11% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.11% fail on Track rod end
  • 2.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.44% fail on Condition
      • 0.22% fail on Requirements
  • 2.0% fail on Tyres
    • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.00% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.11% fail on Size/type
  • 0.44% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.44% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.11% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.11% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.11% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.11% fail on Attachment