MOT Results

Honest John Classics MOT Results » Jaguar » Mark 2
Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Jaguar Mark 2 MOT Results

84.9% pass rate
from 385 tests in 2021
(43% better than other pre-1990 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar Mark 2 is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.0% fail on Brakes
    • 4.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.26% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.26% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.52% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.26% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.26% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.26% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.26% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.26% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.26% fail on Rbt
          • 0.26% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.52% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.52% fail on Lever
    • 0.52% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.52% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.26% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.26% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.26% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.26% fail on Cable
    • 0.26% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.26% fail on Pedal
    • 0.26% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.26% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.26% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.26% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.26% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 5.5% fail on Visibility
    • 4.4% fail on Washers
    • 1.6% fail on Wipers
    • 0.26% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.2% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (59% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.26% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.52% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.52% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.52% fail on Horn
    • 0.26% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.26% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.26% fail on All direction indicators
  • 3.4% fail on Suspension (54% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.78% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.52% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.52% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.52% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.26% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.26% fail on Linkage
    • 0.52% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.26% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.26% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.26% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.26% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.26% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 2.6% fail on Steering
    • 1.0% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.26% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.26% fail on Other components
        • 0.26% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.26% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.52% fail on Steering column
    • 0.52% fail on Steering coupling (6 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Universal joint (8 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.26% fail on Steering box
    • 0.26% fail on Power steering
      • 0.26% fail on Other components
  • 2.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure (67% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.52% fail on System (11 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Pipe
    • 0.52% fail on Transmission
      • 0.52% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.26% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.26% fail on Joints
    • 0.26% fail on Chassis
      • 0.26% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.26% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.26% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.26% fail on Bracket
    • 0.26% fail on Doors
      • 0.26% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.26% fail on Door condition
    • 0.26% fail on Seats
      • 0.26% fail on Driver's seat
  • 1.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (70% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on Exhaust emissions (80% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Spark ignition (79% better than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.78% fail on Non catalyst emissions (74% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.52% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.26% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 0.52% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.52% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.52% fail on Tyres
    • 0.52% fail on Condition
  • 0.26% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.26% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.26% fail on Condition