Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Jaguar Mark 2 MOT Results

82.5% pass rate
from 389 tests in 2020
(35% better than other pre-1990 cars)
Number of tests by age
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar Mark 2 is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.77% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.51% fail on Switch (9 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.77% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.26% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.0% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.0% fail on Horn
  • 6.2% fail on Visibility
    • 5.1% fail on Washers
    • 1.5% fail on Wipers
    • 0.26% fail on View to rear
      • 0.26% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.4% fail on Brakes (43% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.26% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.26% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.26% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.51% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.51% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.26% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt
          • 0.51% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.26% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.26% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 0.77% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.26% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.26% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.26% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.26% fail on Lever
    • 0.26% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.26% fail on Valves
    • 0.26% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.26% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.26% fail on Brake discs
  • 4.9% fail on Suspension
    • 2.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.77% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.51% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.51% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.26% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.26% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.51% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.26% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.26% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.51% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.51% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.26% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.26% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.26% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.26% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.26% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 3.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.5% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.51% fail on Pipe
      • 0.51% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.51% fail on System
    • 1.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.51% fail on Chassis
      • 0.51% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.51% fail on Doors
      • 0.26% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.26% fail on Door condition
      • 0.26% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.26% fail on Door condition
  • 3.1% fail on Steering
    • 1.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.51% fail on Other components (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Steering linkage (8 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.77% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.77% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.51% fail on Power steering
      • 0.26% fail on Operation
      • 0.26% fail on Other components
    • 0.26% fail on Steering wheel
  • 0.77% fail on Tyres
    • 0.51% fail on Condition
    • 0.26% fail on Tread depth
  • 0.51% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (88% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.51% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.26% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 0.26% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.26% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.26% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.26% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.26% fail on Attachment
  • 0.26% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.26% fail on Attachment