MOT Results

Honest John Classics MOT Results » Ford » Granada
Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Ford Granada MOT Results

76.1% pass rate
from 1,008 tests in 2017
(18% better than other pre-1990 cars)
Number of tests by age
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Granada is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (30% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.099% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.099% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 2.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.9% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.89% fail on Rear lamps
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (41% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.4% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.40% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.7% fail on Horn
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators (56% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type (56% better than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.99% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.20% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.099% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.099% fail on Tell tales
        • 0.099% fail on Switch
    • 1.3% fail on Battery
    • 0.99% fail on Stop lamp (66% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.40% fail on Lamp
      • 0.40% fail on Switch
    • 0.099% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 7.4% fail on Suspension
    • 4.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.8% fail on Component mounting
      • 1.5% fail on Subframe mounting (130% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.099% fail on Spring mounting
    • 1.1% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.79% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension (6 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.69% fail on Drive shafts (8 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.099% fail on Universal joint
      • 0.30% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.30% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.99% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.89% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.099% fail on Condition
    • 0.69% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.69% fail on Condition
    • 0.60% fail on Tie bars/rods (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.30% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.20% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.099% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.30% fail on Wheel bearings (83% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Front (82% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Rear
    • 0.20% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.20% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.20% fail on Shock absorbers (80% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Condition (80% better than other pre-1990 cars)
  • 6.9% fail on Brakes (40% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Brake performance (37% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.0% fail on Front wheels (49% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.40% fail on Service brake performance (73% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.9% fail on Components
        • 0.89% fail on Hoses
        • 0.69% fail on Pipes
        • 0.30% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.20% fail on Leaks
      • 0.099% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.099% fail on Operation
    • 0.50% fail on Hub components
      • 0.30% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.20% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.099% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.30% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
    • 0.30% fail on ABS
    • 0.099% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.099% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.099% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.099% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 6.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 2.9% fail on Emissions
    • 2.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.5% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.60% fail on Pipe
      • 0.40% fail on Cap
      • 0.40% fail on System
      • 0.30% fail on Tank
    • 0.40% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 5.6% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.6% fail on Washers
    • 2.2% fail on Wipers
    • 0.50% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.30% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.099% fail on Bonnet
  • 3.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.4% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.4% fail on Chassis
    • 0.89% fail on Body condition
    • 0.69% fail on Doors
      • 0.60% fail on Passengers other (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.099% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.60% fail on Seats
      • 0.60% fail on Drivers
      • 0.099% fail on Passengers
    • 0.20% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.20% fail on Load security
      • 0.099% fail on Access panel
      • 0.099% fail on Bootlid
    • 0.099% fail on Body security
    • 0.099% fail on Spare wheel
  • 2.7% fail on Steering (41% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Steering system (45% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.40% fail on Track rod end (73% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.79% fail on Power steering
      • 0.20% fail on Operation
      • 0.20% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.20% fail on Rams (7 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Other components
    • 0.099% fail on Locking devices
  • 2.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.099% fail on Condition
      • 0.099% fail on Attachment
  • 1.7% fail on Tyres
    • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.40% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.20% fail on Size/type
  • 0.40% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.40% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.099% fail on Towbars
    • 0.099% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 0.099% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.099% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review