MOT Results

Honest John Classics MOT Results » Daimler » Double Six
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Daimler Double Six MOT Results

71.7% pass rate
from 120 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Daimler Double Six is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.5% fail on Headlamps (150% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Headlamp (160% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.5% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 2.5% fail on Horn
      • 0.83% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 4.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.83% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.83% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.83% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.83% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.83% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.83% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.83% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (110% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 13% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 13% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.83% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.83% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.83% fail on Rbt
          • 0.83% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.83% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.83% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.83% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 6.7% fail on Visibility
    • 6.7% fail on Washers
    • 1.7% fail on Wipers
  • 5.0% fail on Steering
    • 3.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.83% fail on Ball joint
    • 3.3% fail on Power steering (8 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Other components (10 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Operation
      • 0.83% fail on Rams
    • 0.83% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.83% fail on Steering rack
  • 5.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.5% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.83% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.7% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.83% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.83% fail on Other leaks
  • 4.2% fail on Suspension
    • 2.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.83% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.83% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.83% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.83% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.83% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 3.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.83% fail on Transmission
      • 0.83% fail on Belts
    • 0.83% fail on Body
      • 0.83% fail on Other body component
    • 0.83% fail on Floor
  • 1.7% fail on Tyres
    • 0.83% fail on Size/type
    • 0.83% fail on Tread depth
  • 0.83% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.83% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.83% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.83% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.83% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.83% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.83% fail on Condition