Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Citroen Dyane MOT Results

70.7% pass rate
from 184 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen Dyane is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 4.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 4.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.54% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.1% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.6% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 1.1% fail on Horn
    • 1.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.54% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.54% fail on Switch
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.3% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 3.8% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.54% fail on Joints
    • 2.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.6% fail on Chassis
      • 1.6% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.6% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.54% fail on Hose
      • 0.54% fail on Pipe
      • 0.54% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 1.6% fail on Doors
      • 1.6% fail on Driver's door (7 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Door condition (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.54% fail on Catch
      • 1.1% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 1.1% fail on Door condition
    • 0.54% fail on Towbar
      • 0.54% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.54% fail on Body
      • 0.54% fail on Panel
    • 0.54% fail on Floor
  • 7.6% fail on Visibility
    • 4.9% fail on Washers
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers
    • 1.1% fail on View to rear (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Mirrors (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
  • 7.1% fail on Suspension
    • 2.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.2% fail on Axles (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on King pins (21 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.54% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.54% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.54% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.54% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.54% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 6.0% fail on Brakes
    • 4.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.54% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.54% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.54% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.54% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.54% fail on Pedal
    • 0.54% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.54% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 4.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.8% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.54% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 3.3% fail on Steering
    • 1.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.6% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.1% fail on Steering column (6 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Steering wheel
  • 2.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.7% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.2% fail on Tyres
    • 1.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.54% fail on Size/type
    • 0.54% fail on Condition
  • 0.54% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.54% fail on Anchorages
Read the Honest John Review