Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Austin Maestro MOT Results

65.2% pass rate
from 161 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Austin Maestro is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Suspension (79% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 11% fail on Prescribed areas (180% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Component mounting (170% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Spring mounting (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 2.5% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.2% fail on Front
      • 1.2% fail on Rear
    • 2.5% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 2.5% fail on Drive shafts
      • 2.5% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 2.5% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 1.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.62% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 16% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 4.3% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.62% fail on Tell tale
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.9% fail on Battery
    • 1.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.2% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.62% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Rear lamps
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.62% fail on Horn
  • 11% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 6.8% fail on Emissions (170% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.62% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 8.7% fail on Brakes
    • 4.3% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 3.7% fail on Components
        • 2.5% fail on Pipes
        • 1.2% fail on Valves (13 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.62% fail on Hoses
      • 0.62% fail on Leaks
    • 3.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.5% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.5% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.2% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.62% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.62% fail on Pedal
        • 0.62% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.62% fail on Hub components
      • 0.62% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.62% fail on Restricted movement
  • 6.8% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.0% fail on Washers
    • 3.1% fail on Wipers
    • 0.62% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (160% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Seat belts (160% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Prescribed areas (190% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
      • 0.62% fail on Requirements
  • 4.3% fail on Tyres
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.9% fail on Condition
  • 3.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.5% fail on Body condition
    • 1.2% fail on Seats
      • 0.62% fail on Passengers
      • 0.62% fail on Drivers
    • 0.62% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.62% fail on Doors
      • 0.62% fail on Passengers other
  • 1.9% fail on Steering
    • 1.2% fail on Steering system
      • 1.2% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.62% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.62% fail on Steering control
      • 0.62% fail on Steering wheel
Read the Honest John Review