MOT Results

Honest John Classics MOT Results » Triumph » Spitfire

Triumph Spitfire MOT Results

70.4% pass rate
from 932 tests in 2021
Number of tests by age
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Triumph Spitfire is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Brakes (52% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 11% fail on Brake performance (68% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (110% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 6.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (110% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
          • 4.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (140% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
      • 5.5% fail on Service brake performance (81% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 5.5% fail on Rbt (86% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
          • 4.5% fail on Service brake performance (84% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 5.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (97% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 5.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (110% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt
          • 0.64% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.54% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.43% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.5% fail on Parking brake control (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Lever (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.86% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.75% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.64% fail on Hand lever (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Pedal
    • 0.64% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.32% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.21% fail on Brake slack adjuster (46 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Clevis joint
      • 0.21% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.21% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.11% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.11% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.11% fail on Master cylinder
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.7% fail on All direction indicators (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.43% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.6% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.3% fail on Horn
      • 0.21% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.11% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.54% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (77% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Rear fog lamp (77% better than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.54% fail on Rear fog lamp (77% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.11% fail on Switch
  • 7.7% fail on Visibility
    • 4.7% fail on Washers
    • 4.2% fail on Wipers (71% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
  • 7.2% fail on Suspension
    • 2.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.11% fail on Suspension arm
    • 2.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (120% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.32% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint (10 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage
    • 0.86% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.54% fail on Ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.11% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.43% fail on Axles
      • 0.32% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
      • 0.11% fail on King pins
    • 0.21% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.11% fail on Springs
      • 0.11% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.11% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.11% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 6.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (49% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (52% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Spark ignition (57% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 5.2% fail on Non catalyst emissions (70% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.54% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.11% fail on Catalyst emissions
      • 0.21% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.21% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (10 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.64% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.43% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.21% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 5.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.4% fail on Doors (180% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Front passenger's door (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.32% fail on Door condition
    • 1.3% fail on Seats
      • 1.2% fail on Driver's seat (150% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.86% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.86% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.64% fail on Chassis
      • 0.64% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.43% fail on Transmission (68% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.32% fail on Joints
      • 0.11% fail on Halfshafts
    • 0.21% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.11% fail on Pipe
      • 0.11% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.11% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.11% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.11% fail on Body
      • 0.11% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.11% fail on Floor
    • 0.11% fail on Cabs
      • 0.11% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 3.9% fail on Steering
    • 2.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.9% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.21% fail on Other components
        • 0.21% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.11% fail on Locking devices
    • 1.2% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.2% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.64% fail on Steering column (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Steering coupling (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Flexible coupling (20 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.11% fail on Steering play
      • 0.11% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.75% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.75% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.54% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
  • 0.75% fail on Tyres
    • 0.43% fail on Condition
    • 0.32% fail on Tread depth
  • 0.64% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.64% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.64% fail on Road Wheels (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.64% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
Read the Honest John Review