MOT Results

Honest John Classics MOT Results » Triumph » Herald
Do you want the Road Tax system to change? Do you have thoughts on the potential changes to the Road Tax system? | No thanks

Triumph Herald MOT Results

72.5% pass rate
from 1,611 tests in 2017
Number of tests by age
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Triumph Herald is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Brakes (23% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 12% fail on Brake performance (42% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Front wheels (82% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Parking brake performance (72% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Rear wheels (46% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.50% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.12% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.3% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 2.5% fail on Components
        • 1.4% fail on Hoses
        • 0.99% fail on Pipes
        • 0.25% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.87% fail on Leaks
      • 0.25% fail on Operation
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.68% fail on Restricted movement (130% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.37% fail on Pedal
        • 0.25% fail on Condition
        • 0.19% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.19% fail on Hub components (78% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.062% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.062% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.062% fail on Components
        • 0.062% fail on Hoses
    • 0.062% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.062% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 13% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (24% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (42% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Horn
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp (37% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.31% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.19% fail on Switch
      • 0.062% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.062% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 2.2% fail on Direction indicators (35% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Flashing type (34% better than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.99% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.56% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.56% fail on Tell tales
        • 0.25% fail on Switch
        • 0.062% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.8% fail on Position lamps (50% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Front lamps (43% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Rear lamps (71% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.062% fail on Switch
    • 1.5% fail on Stop lamp (49% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Battery (69% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.19% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.12% fail on Hazard warning (86% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Lamp
      • 0.062% fail on Switch
    • 0.062% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 7.7% fail on Suspension (21% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 3.1% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.19% fail on Spring mounting (80% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.7% fail on Front
      • 0.19% fail on Rear
    • 1.6% fail on Front suspension joints (72% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.12% fail on Condition
      • 0.062% fail on Attachment
    • 0.43% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.43% fail on Condition
    • 0.37% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment
      • 0.062% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.062% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.062% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.12% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.062% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 0.062% fail on Shackle bracket
    • 0.12% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.062% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.062% fail on Attachment
    • 0.12% fail on Axles
      • 0.12% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 0.12% fail on Drive shafts (88% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.12% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.062% fail on Torsion bars
      • 0.062% fail on Attachment
    • 0.062% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.062% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.062% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 7.5% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.3% fail on Washers
    • 2.7% fail on Wipers
    • 0.12% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.062% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.062% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (34% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Body condition
    • 1.9% fail on Vehicle structure (76% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Chassis (76% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.99% fail on Seats
      • 0.81% fail on Drivers
      • 0.43% fail on Passengers
    • 0.68% fail on Doors
      • 0.50% fail on Drivers
      • 0.25% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.12% fail on Speedometer
  • 4.5% fail on Steering
    • 3.7% fail on Steering system
      • 1.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.6% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.19% fail on Other components
        • 0.19% fail on Steering pivot point
      • 0.12% fail on Free play
        • 0.12% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.062% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.062% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.87% fail on Steering control (110% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Steering column
      • 0.37% fail on Steering coupling (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Flexible coupling (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Universal joint
      • 0.062% fail on Steering wheel
      • 0.062% fail on Steering shaft
    • 0.12% fail on Steering operation
  • 3.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (45% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.50% fail on Cap
      • 0.50% fail on System
      • 0.43% fail on Pipe
      • 0.12% fail on Tank
    • 0.31% fail on Emissions (88% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.062% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 2.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.31% fail on Attachment
      • 0.25% fail on Requirements
      • 0.25% fail on Condition
  • 1.6% fail on Tyres
    • 0.93% fail on Condition
    • 0.62% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.062% fail on Size/type
    • 0.062% fail on Valve stem
  • 0.31% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.19% fail on Registration plate (76% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.12% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.12% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review