Do you want the Road Tax system to change? Do you have thoughts on the potential changes to the Road Tax system? | No thanks
Triumph GT6 MOT Results
73.5% pass rate
from 714 tests in 2017
Number of tests by age
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Triumph GT6 is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
4.8% fail on
Position lamps
- 2.5% fail on Rear lamps
- 1.5% fail on Front lamps
- 0.70% fail on All position lamps
- 4.2% fail on Horn (110% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
-
2.8% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.5% fail on All direction indicators
- 1.1% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.14% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.8% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.7% fail on
Hazard warning
(200% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Lamp (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Switch
- 0.28% fail on Tell tale
-
2.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.0% fail on Headlamp
-
0.28% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.28% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp (58% better than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Battery
- 0.28% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
4.8% fail on
Position lamps
-
12% fail on
Brakes
-
10% fail on
Brake performance
- 5.5% fail on Parking brake performance (61% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Front wheels
- 4.3% fail on Rear wheels
- 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.98% fail on Brake imbalance
-
2.5% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
2.0% fail on
Components
- 1.1% fail on Pipes
- 1.1% fail on Hoses
- 0.84% fail on Leaks
- 0.28% fail on Operation
-
2.0% fail on
Components
-
1.7% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.7% fail on Condition
-
0.42% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.42% fail on
Pedal
- 0.28% fail on Condition
- 0.14% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.42% fail on
Pedal
- 0.14% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.14% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.14% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
-
10% fail on
Brake performance
-
8.1% fail on
Suspension
-
2.8% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 2.5% fail on Component mounting
- 0.28% fail on Subframe mounting
-
2.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.28% fail on Attachment
- 0.14% fail on Condition
-
1.7% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.98% fail on Front
- 0.70% fail on Rear
- 1.3% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.70% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.70% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
(5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Universal joint (17 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
(5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.28% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.14% fail on Condition
- 0.14% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.14% fail on Linkage condition
-
0.42% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.14% fail on Condition
- 0.14% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.14% fail on Attachment
-
0.14% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.14% fail on Condition
-
0.14% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.14% fail on Condition
-
0.14% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.14% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.14% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.14% fail on Condition
-
0.14% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.14% fail on Condition
- 0.14% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
0.14% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.14% fail on Condition
-
2.8% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
5.6% fail on
Steering
-
4.5% fail on
Steering system
- 2.0% fail on Track rod end
- 1.7% fail on Steering rack
-
0.56% fail on
Free play
- 0.56% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Ball joint
-
0.84% fail on
Steering control
- 0.28% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.28% fail on Steering column
- 0.14% fail on Steering shaft
-
0.14% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.14% fail on Universal joint
- 0.28% fail on Steering operation
-
4.5% fail on
Steering system
-
5.5% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 3.4% fail on Washers
- 2.8% fail on Wipers
-
3.5% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
1.5% fail on
Doors
(170% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Drivers (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Passengers front
-
0.84% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.84% fail on Chassis
- 0.84% fail on Body condition
-
0.42% fail on
Seats
- 0.42% fail on Drivers
-
1.5% fail on
Doors
(170% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(54% better than other pre-1990 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.70% fail on System
- 0.42% fail on Pipe
- 0.28% fail on Hose
- 0.14% fail on Cap
- 0.98% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.28% fail on Emissions (89% better than other pre-1990 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Fuel system
-
2.5% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
2.5% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.28% fail on Condition
- 0.14% fail on Attachment
-
0.14% fail on
Installation check
- 0.14% fail on Anchorage's
-
2.5% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.7% fail on
Tyres
- 1.1% fail on Condition
- 0.28% fail on Size/type
- 0.28% fail on Tread depth
-
0.28% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.28% fail on Registration plate
-
0.14% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.14% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Triumph GT6 1968
Fun to drive, and stylish baby E-type