Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Triumph GT6 MOT Results

73.5% pass rate
from 714 tests in 2017
Number of tests by age
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Triumph GT6 is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 4.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.5% fail on Rear lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.70% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.2% fail on Horn (110% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.5% fail on All direction indicators
        • 1.1% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.14% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.7% fail on Hazard warning (200% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Lamp (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Switch
      • 0.28% fail on Tell tale
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.28% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.28% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp (58% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Battery
    • 0.28% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 10% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.5% fail on Parking brake performance (61% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Front wheels
      • 4.3% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.98% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 2.5% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 2.0% fail on Components
        • 1.1% fail on Pipes
        • 1.1% fail on Hoses
      • 0.84% fail on Leaks
      • 0.28% fail on Operation
    • 1.7% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.42% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.42% fail on Pedal
        • 0.28% fail on Condition
        • 0.14% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.14% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.14% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.14% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 8.1% fail on Suspension
    • 2.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.5% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.28% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 2.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.28% fail on Attachment
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.98% fail on Front
      • 0.70% fail on Rear
    • 1.3% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.70% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.70% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.70% fail on Universal joint (17 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.28% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
      • 0.14% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.42% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
      • 0.14% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment
    • 0.14% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.14% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.14% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
    • 0.14% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
  • 5.6% fail on Steering
    • 4.5% fail on Steering system
      • 2.0% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.7% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.56% fail on Free play
        • 0.56% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.84% fail on Steering control
      • 0.28% fail on Steering wheel
      • 0.28% fail on Steering column
      • 0.14% fail on Steering shaft
      • 0.14% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.14% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.28% fail on Steering operation
  • 5.5% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.4% fail on Washers
    • 2.8% fail on Wipers
  • 3.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.5% fail on Doors (170% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Drivers (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.84% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.84% fail on Chassis
    • 0.84% fail on Body condition
    • 0.42% fail on Seats
      • 0.42% fail on Drivers
  • 2.7% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (54% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.70% fail on System
      • 0.42% fail on Pipe
      • 0.28% fail on Hose
      • 0.14% fail on Cap
    • 0.98% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.28% fail on Emissions (89% better than other pre-1990 cars)
  • 2.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.28% fail on Condition
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment
      • 0.14% fail on Installation check
        • 0.14% fail on Anchorage's
  • 1.7% fail on Tyres
    • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.28% fail on Size/type
    • 0.28% fail on Tread depth
  • 0.28% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.28% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.14% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.14% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review