Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Triumph GT6 MOT Results

76.9% pass rate
from 225 tests in 2020
(17% better than other pre-1990 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Triumph GT6 is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (4.6% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Electrical equipment (180% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 3.6% fail on Stop lamp (38% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Direction indicators (33% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Flashing type (33% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Individual direction indicators (43% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on All direction indicators (160% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim (7.5% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim (0.77% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps (39% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp (36% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (1.7% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.44% fail on Switch
  • 8.4% fail on Brakes (8.3% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 8.0% fail on Brake performance (15% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (120% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 6.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (140% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (17% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 3.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (22% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
          • 3.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (49% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance (7.1% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance (27% better than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt (24% better than other pre-1990 cars)
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance (9.5% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Parking brake performance (22% better than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.89% fail on Rbt (19% better than other pre-1990 cars)
          • 0.89% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (200% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.89% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (62% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Pedal (120% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.44% fail on Lever
    • 0.44% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.44% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.44% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 6.2% fail on Suspension (20% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Wheel bearings (150% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Suspension arms (21% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.44% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.89% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (70% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 6.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure (6.4% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure (31% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (33% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Seats (130% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Driver's seat (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.89% fail on Body (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Mounting fixings (22 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Doors (84% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Front passenger's door (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.89% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Chassis
      • 0.44% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.44% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.44% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.44% fail on Pipe
    • 0.44% fail on Transmission
      • 0.44% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.44% fail on Flexible couplings
    • 0.44% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.44% fail on Bracket
    • 0.44% fail on Floor
  • 5.3% fail on Visibility (15% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Wipers (28% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Washers (36% better than other pre-1990 cars)
  • 2.2% fail on Steering (40% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Steering gear (57% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Steering rack (84% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.44% fail on Other components
        • 0.44% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.44% fail on Steering wheel
  • 1.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (68% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Exhaust emissions (76% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Spark ignition (74% better than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.44% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.44% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.44% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.44% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.89% fail on Identification of the vehicle (41% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Registration plates (46% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
  • 0.89% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (46% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Seat belts (46% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.44% fail on Attachment
  • 0.89% fail on Tyres (36% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Condition
    • 0.44% fail on Tread depth
  • 0.44% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.44% fail on Anchorages
Read the Honest John Review