Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Toyota Land Cruiser MOT Results

66.7% pass rate
from 315 tests in 2020
Number of tests by age
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.7% fail on Stop lamp (130% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (140% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (140% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 5.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Switch
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.32% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.63% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.32% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.9% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.2% fail on Horn
      • 0.63% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.32% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.63% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.63% fail on Switch
    • 0.63% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.32% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.32% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.32% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 8.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 1.9% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (8 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.4% fail on Rbt
          • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.95% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.32% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.95% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.95% fail on Rbt
          • 0.95% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.6% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.95% fail on Pedal
      • 0.63% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.95% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.95% fail on Brake fluid (6 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.95% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.63% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.63% fail on Lever
    • 0.63% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.63% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.63% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.63% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.63% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.63% fail on Brake pads
  • 9.8% fail on Visibility
    • 6.0% fail on Washers
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers
    • 0.32% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.32% fail on View to rear
      • 0.32% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.3% fail on Suspension
    • 3.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes (11 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (7 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (50 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.32% fail on Linkage
    • 3.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.95% fail on Springs
      • 0.63% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.32% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.32% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
      • 0.32% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.32% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.32% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 8.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure (160% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (160% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.6% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.95% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.32% fail on Pipe
      • 0.32% fail on System
    • 1.3% fail on Towbar (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Vehicle structure (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Coupling
    • 0.32% fail on Chassis
      • 0.32% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.32% fail on Transmission
      • 0.32% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.32% fail on Prop shaft
    • 0.32% fail on Body
      • 0.32% fail on Other body component
    • 0.32% fail on Doors
      • 0.32% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.32% fail on Door condition
  • 6.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.1% fail on Compression ignition (12 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (12 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested (18 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (12 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.63% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.32% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 1.6% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.95% fail on Transmission oil leaks (9 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.32% fail on Other leaks
  • 4.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (170% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Seat belts (170% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Prescribed areas (190% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
  • 4.1% fail on Steering
    • 3.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.6% fail on Drag link end (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.95% fail on Locking devices (6 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.32% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.32% fail on Steering box
    • 0.32% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.32% fail on Power steering
      • 0.32% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.32% fail on Steering play
      • 0.32% fail on Steering box
  • 0.95% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.95% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
  • 0.63% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.63% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.32% fail on Tyres
    • 0.32% fail on Tread depth