MOT Results

Honest John Classics MOT Results » Toyota » Land Cruiser
Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Toyota Land Cruiser MOT Results

65.4% pass rate
from 286 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (36% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 4.5% fail on Fog lamp (120% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.35% fail on Switch
    • 4.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.1% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.0% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.35% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Battery
    • 2.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.8% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.35% fail on Tell tales
    • 2.8% fail on Horn
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.35% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.35% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 1.0% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.70% fail on Switch
      • 0.35% fail on Lamp
    • 0.35% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.35% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 9.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.5% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.8% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Brake operation (12 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Front wheels (73% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.35% fail on Gradient hand brake
    • 8.0% fail on Hydraulic systems (140% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 7.0% fail on Components (170% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 3.8% fail on Hoses (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Pipes
        • 0.35% fail on Valves
      • 0.70% fail on Operation
      • 0.70% fail on Leaks
    • 2.1% fail on Hub components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake pads (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.0% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.35% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.35% fail on Pedal
        • 0.35% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.35% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.35% fail on Linkage
    • 0.35% fail on Restricted movement
  • 9.1% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.2% fail on Wipers
    • 5.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.70% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.35% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.1% fail on Emissions
    • 1.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.70% fail on System
      • 0.35% fail on Pipe
  • 6.6% fail on Suspension
    • 2.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Attachment
      • 0.35% fail on Linkage condition
    • 2.1% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.1% fail on Front
    • 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.4% fail on Spring mounting
      • 0.70% fail on Component mounting
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.70% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.35% fail on Condition
      • 0.35% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.35% fail on Shackle
    • 0.70% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.35% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.35% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.35% fail on Axles
      • 0.35% fail on Swivel joints/housing
  • 5.6% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 3.8% fail on Body condition (190% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Seats
      • 0.70% fail on Drivers
      • 0.35% fail on Passengers
    • 0.35% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.35% fail on Body security
    • 0.35% fail on Doors
      • 0.35% fail on Drivers
  • 4.9% fail on Steering
    • 3.8% fail on Steering system
      • 2.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.70% fail on Other components
        • 0.70% fail on Steering pivot point (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Free play
        • 0.35% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.35% fail on Intermediate drop arm
      • 0.35% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.70% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.35% fail on Steering control
      • 0.35% fail on Steering shaft
      • 0.35% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.35% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.35% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 4.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (110% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Seat belts (110% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.0% fail on Requirements (6 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Condition
      • 0.35% fail on Attachment
  • 1.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.70% fail on Tyres
    • 0.70% fail on Condition
  • 0.70% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.70% fail on Attachment
  • 0.35% fail on Towbars
    • 0.35% fail on Vehicle structure