Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Rover 100 MOT Results

81.4% pass rate
from 458 tests in 2017
(36% better than other pre-1990 cars)
Number of tests by age
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 100 is unusually good or bad.

  • 10% fail on Brakes
    • 7.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.8% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.5% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.8% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.66% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.44% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.22% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 3.3% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 2.0% fail on Components
        • 1.3% fail on Hoses
        • 0.22% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.22% fail on Pipes
        • 0.22% fail on Reservoirs
      • 1.5% fail on Leaks (170% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 0.66% fail on Hub components
      • 0.22% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.22% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.22% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.66% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.22% fail on Locking devices
  • 6.3% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (62% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Position lamps (70% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.22% fail on Rear lamps
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim (75% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Direction indicators (87% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Flashing type (87% better than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.22% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.22% fail on Switch
    • 0.44% fail on Horn (79% better than other pre-1990 cars)
  • 4.8% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.9% fail on Washers
    • 1.5% fail on Wipers
  • 3.9% fail on Suspension (60% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas (67% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.44% fail on Spring mounting
    • 1.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.66% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.22% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment
      • 0.22% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.87% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.66% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment
    • 0.87% fail on Axles
      • 0.87% fail on King pins (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.22% fail on Shackle bracket
    • 0.22% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.22% fail on Rear
    • 0.22% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 3.7% fail on Steering
    • 3.5% fail on Steering system
      • 2.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.87% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.44% fail on Steering box
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.22% fail on Lock stop
    • 0.22% fail on Steering control
      • 0.22% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.22% fail on Steering operation
  • 2.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.87% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.87% fail on Chassis
    • 0.66% fail on Body condition
    • 0.22% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.22% fail on Body security
  • 1.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (77% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.22% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.22% fail on System
  • 0.66% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.66% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.44% fail on Condition
      • 0.22% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.44% fail on Tyres (80% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Tread depth