MOT Results

Honest John Classics MOT Results » Peugeot » 309

Peugeot 309 MOT Results

66.3% pass rate
from 166 tests in 2021
Number of tests by age
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 309 is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance (78% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.4% fail on Rbt
          • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 4.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 4.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
      • 4.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt
          • 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.2% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.2% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (7 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.60% fail on Cable
        • 0.60% fail on Lever
      • 0.60% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.60% fail on Brake linings
    • 1.2% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.60% fail on Pedal
      • 0.60% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.2% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.2% fail on Lever
    • 1.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.60% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.60% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.60% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 13% fail on Suspension (79% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (140% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.60% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 3.0% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (18 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 1.8% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.60% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.60% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.60% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.60% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 9.6% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.60% fail on Dipswitch
    • 2.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.8% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.60% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.2% fail on Horn
    • 0.60% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.60% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 9.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.8% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 4.8% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.2% fail on Chassis
      • 1.2% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.2% fail on Bumpers (13 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Doors
      • 0.60% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.60% fail on Catch
    • 0.60% fail on Seats
      • 0.60% fail on Driver's seat
  • 5.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.2% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.6% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.60% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.60% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.60% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.60% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.60% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 4.8% fail on Visibility
    • 4.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.60% fail on Wipers
  • 2.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
  • 1.8% fail on Steering
    • 1.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.2% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.60% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.60% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.8% fail on Tyres
    • 1.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.60% fail on Condition
  • 0.60% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.60% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.60% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.60% fail on Attachment