MOT Results

Honest John Classics MOT Results » Nissan » Cherry
Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Nissan Cherry MOT Results

68.0% pass rate
from 125 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Cherry is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Brake performance
      • 12% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 6.4% fail on Rear wheels
      • 4.0% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.80% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 5.6% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 3.2% fail on Components
        • 2.4% fail on Pipes
        • 0.80% fail on Hoses
      • 0.80% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.80% fail on Operation
      • 0.80% fail on Leaks
    • 0.80% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.80% fail on Condition
    • 0.80% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.80% fail on Pedal
        • 0.80% fail on Condition
  • 15% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 4.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.2% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.80% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.4% fail on Battery
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.6% fail on Switch (10 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.80% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.80% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.80% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.80% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.80% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.80% fail on Switch
    • 0.80% fail on Horn
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 9.6% fail on Prescribed areas (140% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 8.8% fail on Component mounting (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Subframe mounting (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Front drive shafts (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 4.0% fail on Constant velocity joints (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.80% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.80% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.80% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.80% fail on Condition
  • 6.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 3.2% fail on Emissions
    • 1.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.6% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.6% fail on Cap
    • 0.80% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 5.6% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.2% fail on Washers
    • 1.6% fail on Wipers
    • 0.80% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.2% fail on Steering
    • 2.4% fail on Steering system
      • 1.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.80% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.80% fail on Locking devices
  • 2.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.4% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.6% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.6% fail on Chassis
    • 0.80% fail on Body condition
  • 1.6% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.80% fail on Tyres
    • 0.80% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review