Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Land Rover Range Rover MOT Results

69.3% pass rate
from 1,680 tests in 2017
Number of tests by age
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Range Rover is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.2% fail on Headlamp aim (42% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.18% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.12% fail on Switch
    • 3.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.3% fail on Side repeaters (88% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.77% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.77% fail on Individual lamps (54% better than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Tell tales
        • 0.24% fail on Switch
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.30% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.30% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.060% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.060% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.060% fail on Switch
    • 2.6% fail on Battery (120% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.5% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.36% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.30% fail on Switch
    • 1.4% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.77% fail on Switch (160% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Lamp
      • 0.060% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.1% fail on Horn (45% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.18% fail on Trailer electrical socket (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.060% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 10% fail on Brakes
    • 4.2% fail on Brake performance (50% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance (61% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Rear wheels (84% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Front wheels (86% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.36% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.060% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.060% fail on Gradient hand brake
    • 4.0% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 3.3% fail on Components
        • 2.7% fail on Pipes (98% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.65% fail on Hoses
        • 0.060% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.060% fail on Pump
      • 0.42% fail on Leaks
      • 0.36% fail on Operation
      • 0.12% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Hub components (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs (6 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Brake pads (180% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.12% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (7 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
    • 0.54% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.54% fail on Condition
    • 0.48% fail on ABS (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.36% fail on Pedal
        • 0.24% fail on Condition
        • 0.12% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.18% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.12% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up (12 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Components
        • 0.060% fail on Servos
    • 0.18% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.060% fail on Additional braking devices
    • 0.060% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.060% fail on Lever
  • 9.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (160% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Vehicle structure (120% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Chassis (120% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Passengers front (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Passengers other (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Drivers
    • 0.95% fail on Seats
      • 0.65% fail on Drivers
      • 0.36% fail on Passengers
    • 0.48% fail on Load security (9 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Tailgate (35 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Access panel (9 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Bootlid
    • 0.18% fail on Body security
    • 0.12% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.12% fail on Speedometer
  • 8.2% fail on Suspension
    • 2.7% fail on Shock absorbers (170% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Condition (170% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas (52% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Component mounting (50% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Spring mounting
      • 0.12% fail on Subframe mounting (81% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.3% fail on Front
      • 0.24% fail on Rear
    • 0.83% fail on Coil springs (140% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Location (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Condition
    • 0.71% fail on Panhard rods (10 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (12 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Attachment
    • 0.65% fail on Axles
      • 0.48% fail on Swivel joints/housing (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Stub axle
      • 0.060% fail on King pins
      • 0.060% fail on Clearance
    • 0.54% fail on Suspension arms (58% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.36% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.24% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.30% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.060% fail on Attachment
    • 0.36% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.060% fail on Attachment
      • 0.060% fail on Presence
    • 0.30% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.24% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.060% fail on Attachment
    • 0.30% fail on Torque/reaction arms (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Attachment
    • 0.12% fail on Drive shafts (88% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.060% fail on Universal joint
        • 0.060% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.060% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.060% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.060% fail on Torsion bars
      • 0.060% fail on Attachment
    • 0.060% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 7.1% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.6% fail on Washers
    • 2.8% fail on Wipers
    • 0.42% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.18% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.18% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.8% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 2.9% fail on Emissions
    • 2.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.8% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.77% fail on System
      • 0.54% fail on Pipe
      • 0.24% fail on Cap
      • 0.18% fail on Hose
      • 0.12% fail on Tank
    • 0.36% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 6.0% fail on Steering (31% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Steering system (40% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.2% fail on Steering box (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Drag link end (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Ball joint (130% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Steering arm (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Other components
        • 0.30% fail on Steering pivot point
        • 0.060% fail on Steering component
      • 0.30% fail on Free play
        • 0.30% fail on Steering box
      • 0.24% fail on Intermediate drop arm (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Steering damper (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Lock stop
    • 0.42% fail on Steering control
      • 0.18% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.18% fail on Universal joint
      • 0.12% fail on Steering wheel
      • 0.12% fail on Steering column
    • 0.42% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.42% fail on Locking devices (190% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Power steering
      • 0.30% fail on Other components
      • 0.12% fail on Operation
      • 0.060% fail on Pump
    • 0.060% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 5.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (130% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Seat belts (130% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Prescribed areas (140% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Condition (140% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Requirements (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment
  • 1.8% fail on Tyres
    • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.54% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.24% fail on Size/type
  • 1.3% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate
    • 0.060% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.60% fail on Towbars (170% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.12% fail on Towbar
  • 0.18% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.18% fail on Attachment