MOT Results

Honest John Classics MOT Results » Land Rover » Range Rover

Land Rover Range Rover MOT Results

75.7% pass rate
from 1,088 tests in 2021
Number of tests by age
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Range Rover is unusually good or bad.

  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.092% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.83% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.74% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.092% fail on Switch
    • 1.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps (57% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp (59% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.092% fail on Dipswitch
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.0% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.55% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.46% fail on Horn
    • 0.28% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.18% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
      • 0.092% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.092% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.092% fail on Switch
    • 0.092% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 7.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.0% fail on Chassis
      • 1.0% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.92% fail on Doors
      • 0.55% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.46% fail on Door condition
        • 0.092% fail on Catch
      • 0.37% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.37% fail on Door condition
      • 0.092% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.092% fail on Door condition
    • 0.55% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.28% fail on Pipe
      • 0.18% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.092% fail on System
    • 0.55% fail on Body
      • 0.37% fail on Mounting fixings (10 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.092% fail on Body condition
      • 0.092% fail on Panel
    • 0.46% fail on Seats
      • 0.28% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.18% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.37% fail on Transmission (73% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Drive shafts (82% better than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Drive shaft (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.092% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.092% fail on Joints
    • 0.18% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.18% fail on Floor
    • 0.092% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.092% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.092% fail on Cabs
      • 0.092% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 7.0% fail on Brakes
    • 3.4% fail on Brake performance (50% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (11 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.74% fail on Rbt (sp) (74% better than other pre-1990 cars)
          • 0.55% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.37% fail on Service brake imbalance (82% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (56% better than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.64% fail on Rbt (sp) (74% better than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.55% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Service brake performance (79% better than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.55% fail on Rbt (81% better than other pre-1990 cars)
          • 0.46% fail on Service brake performance (81% better than other pre-1990 cars)
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.18% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.37% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.28% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.18% fail on Rbt (81% better than other pre-1990 cars)
          • 0.18% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.092% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.092% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.092% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.092% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.092% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 2.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.74% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.64% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (6 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.092% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.46% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.28% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.28% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.092% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.092% fail on Pedal
    • 0.092% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.092% fail on Servos
    • 0.092% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.092% fail on Lever
    • 0.092% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.092% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.092% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.092% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 5.7% fail on Visibility
    • 3.8% fail on Washers
    • 2.3% fail on Wipers
    • 0.18% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.18% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.092% fail on View to rear
      • 0.092% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.6% fail on Suspension (38% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.64% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.46% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.18% fail on Suspension arm
    • 1.0% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.83% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (70% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (11 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.092% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.092% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.092% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.092% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.55% fail on Springs
      • 0.28% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.18% fail on Mounting
        • 0.092% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.28% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.55% fail on Suspension rods (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (25 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.18% fail on Suspension rod (8 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.092% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.092% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.28% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.092% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.092% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 4.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (150% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Seat belts (150% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Condition (170% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment
      • 0.092% fail on Requirements
  • 3.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.5% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.46% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.092% fail on Catalyst emissions
      • 0.18% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.092% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.092% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    • 0.83% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.46% fail on Transmission oil leaks (6 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.18% fail on Other leaks
  • 3.8% fail on Steering
    • 2.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.83% fail on Ball joint (170% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.18% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.092% fail on Intermediate drop arm
    • 0.55% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.55% fail on Steering box (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Power steering
      • 0.37% fail on Operation
      • 0.18% fail on Other components
      • 0.092% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.46% fail on Steering play
      • 0.46% fail on Steering box (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.18% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.092% fail on Steering wheel
  • 0.74% fail on Tyres
    • 0.37% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.28% fail on Condition
    • 0.092% fail on Size/type
  • 0.37% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.37% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.28% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.092% fail on Condition
    • 0.092% fail on Attachment
    • 0.092% fail on Hubs