MOT Results

Honest John Classics MOT Results » Daihatsu » Fourtrak

Daihatsu Fourtrak MOT Results

61.7% pass rate
from 149 tests in 2021
(49% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Fourtrak is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (66% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.67% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 6.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (160% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (160% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 5.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.67% fail on Switch
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.0% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
      • 0.67% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.67% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.67% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.67% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.67% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.67% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.67% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.67% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.67% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure (92% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Chassis
      • 2.0% fail on Chassis condition
    • 2.0% fail on Transmission
      • 2.0% fail on Prop shafts (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Joints (6 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.67% fail on Prop shaft
    • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.3% fail on Tank (11 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 1.3% fail on Body (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Panel
      • 0.67% fail on Other body component
    • 0.67% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.67% fail on Towbar
      • 0.67% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.67% fail on Floor
    • 0.67% fail on Seats
      • 0.67% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.67% fail on Cabs
      • 0.67% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 11% fail on Brakes
    • 8.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.7% fail on Rbt
          • 4.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 4.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.67% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.67% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.67% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt
          • 0.67% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.67% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 2.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.67% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.67% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.67% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.67% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.67% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 5.4% fail on Springs (6 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Leaf springs (34 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Leaf spring (68 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts (43 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Shackle bracket (104 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.67% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
    • 4.7% fail on Axles (12 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (16 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on King pins
      • 0.67% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 2.0% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes (10 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.67% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.67% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.67% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.67% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.67% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.67% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 9.4% fail on Visibility
    • 5.4% fail on Wipers
    • 4.7% fail on Washers
  • 6.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 6.7% fail on Seat belts (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
  • 6.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.7% fail on Compression ignition (8 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested (16 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.67% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.67% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 2.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.3% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.67% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 1.3% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.67% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.67% fail on Other leaks
  • 5.4% fail on Steering
    • 4.0% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.3% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.67% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.67% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.67% fail on Steering box
    • 0.67% fail on Power steering
      • 0.67% fail on Operation
    • 0.67% fail on Steering play
      • 0.67% fail on Steering box
  • 2.0% fail on Tyres
    • 2.0% fail on Condition
  • 1.3% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plates