Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Daihatsu Fourtrak MOT Results

73.5% pass rate
from 170 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Fourtrak is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure (110% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Exhaust system (200% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.4% fail on Chassis
      • 2.4% fail on Chassis condition
    • 2.4% fail on Towbar (10 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Vehicle structure (8 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Towbar condition
    • 2.4% fail on Transmission
      • 1.2% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.2% fail on Joints
      • 1.2% fail on Prop shafts
        • 1.2% fail on Joints (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Body
      • 1.2% fail on Other body component (9 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Panel
    • 0.59% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.59% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.59% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.59% fail on Floor
    • 0.59% fail on Cabs
      • 0.59% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 5.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 5.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.59% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 2.4% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.8% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.59% fail on Horn
    • 1.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.59% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.59% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.59% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.59% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.59% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.59% fail on Switch
    • 0.59% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.59% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 10% fail on Suspension
    • 3.5% fail on Springs (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Leaf springs (17 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Leaf spring (51 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.59% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
        • 0.59% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
      • 0.59% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.9% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.4% fail on Other suspension component (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes (8 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.59% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.59% fail on Axles
      • 0.59% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
  • 8.8% fail on Brakes
    • 4.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.59% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.59% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt
          • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.2% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.2% fail on Pedal
    • 0.59% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.59% fail on Lever
    • 0.59% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.59% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.59% fail on Valves
    • 0.59% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.59% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.59% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.59% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.59% fail on Brake pads
  • 7.1% fail on Visibility
    • 5.3% fail on Wipers
    • 1.8% fail on Washers
  • 7.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Seat belts (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Requirements
  • 5.3% fail on Steering
    • 4.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.8% fail on Locking devices (13 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.59% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.59% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.59% fail on Other components
        • 0.59% fail on Steering component
      • 0.59% fail on Lock stop
    • 1.2% fail on Power steering
      • 1.2% fail on Pump (26 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Operation
  • 5.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.4% fail on Compression ignition (6 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Emissions not tested (21 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 0.59% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 1.8% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.8% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.59% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.59% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 2.9% fail on Identification of the vehicle (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Registration plates (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
  • 1.8% fail on Tyres
    • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.59% fail on Tread depth
  • 0.59% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.59% fail on Attachment