Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Citroen C25 MOT Results

56.3% pass rate
from 144 tests in 2020
Number of tests by age
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C25 is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 9.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 9.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 9.0% fail on Direction indicators (170% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 9.0% fail on Flashing type (170% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
        • 4.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 3.5% fail on Side repeaters (4 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Switch (12 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 6.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.69% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.2% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.69% fail on Switch
    • 3.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 3.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 3.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 3.5% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.1% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.69% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.69% fail on Horn
    • 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.1% fail on Stop lamp
  • 24% fail on Body, chassis, structure (83% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 13% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 6.9% fail on Transmission (160% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 6.9% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
        • 6.9% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Chassis
      • 2.8% fail on Chassis condition
    • 2.1% fail on Body
      • 1.4% fail on Other body component
      • 0.69% fail on Panel
    • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.69% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.69% fail on System
    • 1.4% fail on Bumpers
    • 1.4% fail on Seats
      • 1.4% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.69% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.69% fail on Cabs
      • 0.69% fail on Steps
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 10% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 5.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.69% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.69% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.69% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.69% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.69% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.8% fail on Load sensing valves (6 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Hydraulic systems (5 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Valves (14 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Brake fluid
    • 1.4% fail on Air and vacuum systems (11 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
      • 0.69% fail on Servos
    • 0.69% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.69% fail on Pedal
    • 0.69% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.69% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.69% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 10% fail on Suspension
    • 7.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.4% fail on Springs
      • 1.4% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.69% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.69% fail on Anchor bracket
    • 0.69% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.69% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.69% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.69% fail on Pipes
  • 8.3% fail on Visibility
    • 4.9% fail on Wipers
    • 3.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.69% fail on View to rear
      • 0.69% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.9% fail on Steering
    • 2.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.8% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.69% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.69% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.69% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.69% fail on Steering column
  • 4.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.69% fail on Condition
  • 2.8% fail on Tyres
    • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.69% fail on Size/type
    • 0.69% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (78% better than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.69% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.69% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.69% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.69% fail on Emissions not tested