MOT Results

Honest John Classics MOT Results » Citroen » C15
Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Citroen C15 MOT Results

51.9% pass rate
from 154 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C15 is unusually good or bad.

  • 36% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (42% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 13% fail on Headlamps (140% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 12% fail on Headlamp (170% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Switch
      • 0.65% fail on Dipswitch
    • 13% fail on Headlamp aim (89% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 12% fail on Direction indicators (170% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 12% fail on Flashing type (170% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
        • 9.7% fail on Side repeaters (14 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
        • 3.2% fail on Individual lamps
    • 9.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.2% fail on Front lamps
      • 4.5% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.65% fail on Switch
    • 9.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 5.2% fail on Fog lamp
      • 1.3% fail on Switch
    • 5.8% fail on Battery (140% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Hazard warning
      • 1.9% fail on Lamp
      • 1.3% fail on Switch
      • 1.3% fail on Tell tale (6 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Horn
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (8 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.65% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 25% fail on Suspension (51% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 19% fail on Prescribed areas (130% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 14% fail on Component mounting (120% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 7.1% fail on Subframe mounting (8 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 5.2% fail on Spring mounting (170% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 7.1% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 7.1% fail on Front drive shafts (5 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
        • 7.1% fail on Constant velocity joints (5 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.65% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.65% fail on Attachment
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.9% fail on Front
      • 0.65% fail on Rear
    • 1.3% fail on Coil springs
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Sub-frames (8 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Condition (8 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 0.65% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.65% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.65% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.65% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.65% fail on Condition
  • 24% fail on Brakes
    • 18% fail on Brake performance
      • 10% fail on Front wheels
      • 7.1% fail on Rear wheels
      • 6.5% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 5.8% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.65% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 12% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 11% fail on Components (88% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
        • 5.2% fail on Pipes
        • 5.2% fail on Valves (11 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Hoses
      • 0.65% fail on Leaks
    • 1.9% fail on Service brake control components
      • 1.9% fail on Pedal
        • 1.3% fail on Condition
        • 0.65% fail on Anti-slip
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Hub components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs (4 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.3% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (7 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 0.65% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.65% fail on Cable
    • 0.65% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.65% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
    • 0.65% fail on Restricted movement
  • 9.7% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 8.4% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.3% fail on Pipe
      • 0.65% fail on Cap
      • 0.65% fail on System
    • 1.9% fail on Emissions
    • 0.65% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 8.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (120% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 8.4% fail on Seat belts (120% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 7.1% fail on Prescribed areas (140% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Condition
      • 0.65% fail on Attachment
  • 8.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.5% fail on Washers
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers
    • 0.65% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.65% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.1% fail on Tyres
    • 4.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.65% fail on Size/type
  • 7.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 3.2% fail on Body condition
    • 2.6% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.6% fail on Chassis
    • 0.65% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.65% fail on Seats
      • 0.65% fail on Passengers
      • 0.65% fail on Drivers
  • 5.8% fail on Steering
    • 3.9% fail on Steering system
      • 1.9% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.3% fail on Steering arm (9 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.65% fail on Steering control
      • 0.65% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.65% fail on Flexible coupling
    • 0.65% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.65% fail on Locking devices
  • 0.65% fail on Towbars
    • 0.65% fail on Vehicle structure