Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks
Citroen C15 MOT Results
51.9% pass rate
from 154 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C15 is unusually good or bad.
-
36% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(42% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
-
13% fail on
Headlamps
(140% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
- 12% fail on Headlamp (170% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
- 0.65% fail on Switch
- 0.65% fail on Dipswitch
- 13% fail on Headlamp aim (89% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
-
12% fail on
Direction indicators
(170% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
-
12% fail on
Flashing type
(170% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
- 9.7% fail on Side repeaters (14 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
- 3.2% fail on Individual lamps
-
12% fail on
Flashing type
(170% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
-
9.7% fail on
Position lamps
- 5.2% fail on Front lamps
- 4.5% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.65% fail on Switch
- 9.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
6.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 5.2% fail on Fog lamp
- 1.3% fail on Switch
- 5.8% fail on Battery (140% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
- 3.2% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.6% fail on
Hazard warning
- 1.9% fail on Lamp
- 1.3% fail on Switch
- 1.3% fail on Tell tale (6 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
- 2.6% fail on Horn
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (8 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.65% fail on Rear reflectors
-
13% fail on
Headlamps
(140% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
-
25% fail on
Suspension
(51% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
-
19% fail on
Prescribed areas
(130% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
- 14% fail on Component mounting (120% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
- 7.1% fail on Subframe mounting (8 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
- 5.2% fail on Spring mounting (170% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
-
7.1% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
-
7.1% fail on
Front drive shafts
(5 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
- 7.1% fail on Constant velocity joints (5 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
-
7.1% fail on
Front drive shafts
(5 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
-
2.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.65% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.65% fail on Attachment
-
1.9% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.9% fail on Front
- 0.65% fail on Rear
-
1.3% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.3% fail on Condition
-
1.3% fail on
Sub-frames
(8 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Condition (8 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
-
0.65% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.65% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.65% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.65% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.65% fail on Condition
-
19% fail on
Prescribed areas
(130% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
-
24% fail on
Brakes
-
18% fail on
Brake performance
- 10% fail on Front wheels
- 7.1% fail on Rear wheels
- 6.5% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
- 5.8% fail on Parking brake performance
- 1.9% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.65% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
12% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
11% fail on
Components
(88% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
- 5.2% fail on Pipes
- 5.2% fail on Valves (11 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Hoses
- 0.65% fail on Leaks
-
11% fail on
Components
(88% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
-
1.9% fail on
Service brake control components
-
1.9% fail on
Pedal
- 1.3% fail on Condition
- 0.65% fail on Anti-slip
-
1.9% fail on
Pedal
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.3% fail on Condition
-
1.3% fail on
Hub components
- 1.3% fail on Brake discs (4 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 1.3% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (7 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
-
0.65% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.65% fail on Cable
-
0.65% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.65% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
- 0.65% fail on Restricted movement
-
18% fail on
Brake performance
-
9.7% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 8.4% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
-
2.6% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.3% fail on Pipe
- 0.65% fail on Cap
- 0.65% fail on System
- 1.9% fail on Emissions
- 0.65% fail on Emissions not tested
-
8.4% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(120% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
-
8.4% fail on
Seat belts
(120% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
- 7.1% fail on Prescribed areas (140% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
- 0.65% fail on Condition
- 0.65% fail on Attachment
-
8.4% fail on
Seat belts
(120% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
-
8.4% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.5% fail on Washers
- 3.2% fail on Wipers
- 0.65% fail on Bonnet
- 0.65% fail on Windscreen
-
7.1% fail on
Tyres
- 4.5% fail on Condition
- 1.9% fail on Tread depth
- 0.65% fail on Size/type
-
7.1% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 3.2% fail on Body condition
-
2.6% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 2.6% fail on Chassis
- 0.65% fail on Engine mountings
-
0.65% fail on
Seats
- 0.65% fail on Passengers
- 0.65% fail on Drivers
-
5.8% fail on
Steering
-
3.9% fail on
Steering system
- 1.9% fail on Track rod end
- 1.3% fail on Steering arm (9 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
- 0.65% fail on Ball joint
-
0.65% fail on
Steering control
-
0.65% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.65% fail on Flexible coupling
-
0.65% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.65% fail on Steering operation
- 0.65% fail on Locking devices
-
3.9% fail on
Steering system
-
0.65% fail on
Towbars
- 0.65% fail on Vehicle structure