MOT Results

Honest John Classics MOT Results » Citroen » C15
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Citroen C15 MOT Results

53.6% pass rate
from 153 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C15 is unusually good or bad.

  • 31% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (54% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 11% fail on Headlamps (130% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 10% fail on Headlamp (130% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 11% fail on Headlamp aim (140% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 11% fail on Headlamp aim (160% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 5.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 2.6% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.0% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 2.0% fail on Horn
      • 0.65% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 3.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.9% fail on Position lamp
    • 3.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Hazard warning
      • 1.3% fail on Switch
    • 0.65% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.65% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 7.8% fail on Suspension arms (110% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 2.0% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.0% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.65% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.3% fail on Springs
      • 0.65% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.65% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.65% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.3% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.65% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.65% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.65% fail on Axles
      • 0.65% fail on Axle
    • 0.65% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Brake performance
      • 9.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 9.2% fail on Rbt
          • 7.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 7.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 7.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 5.2% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
          • 4.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.3% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 3.3% fail on Load sensing valves (7 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.3% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.65% fail on Servos
      • 0.65% fail on Valves
    • 1.3% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (13 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
        • 0.65% fail on Other braking system component
    • 1.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.65% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.65% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.65% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.65% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.65% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.65% fail on Servos
    • 0.65% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 3.9% fail on Chassis
      • 3.9% fail on Chassis condition
    • 2.6% fail on Transmission
      • 2.6% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.6% fail on Joints
    • 2.0% fail on Spare wheel (43 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Carrier (39 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 1.3% fail on Body
      • 1.3% fail on Panel
    • 0.65% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.65% fail on Hose
    • 0.65% fail on Floor
  • 11% fail on Visibility
    • 7.8% fail on Washers
    • 4.6% fail on Wipers
    • 0.65% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.65% fail on View to rear
      • 0.65% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 5.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 5.9% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 4.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.3% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Emissions not tested (7 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 1.3% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.65% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.65% fail on Other leaks
  • 3.9% fail on Steering
    • 3.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.3% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.65% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.65% fail on Steering rack
  • 3.9% fail on Tyres
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.65% fail on Size/type
    • 0.65% fail on Condition
  • 0.65% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.65% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.65% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.65% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.65% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.65% fail on Attachment