Do you want the Road Tax system to change? Do you have thoughts on the potential changes to the Road Tax system? | No thanks
Citroen AX MOT Results
58.1% pass rate
from 86 tests in 2017
(43% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen AX is unusually good or bad.
-
26% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
10% fail on
Headlamps
(2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 10% fail on Headlamp (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 9.3% fail on Headlamp aim
-
8.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
8.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.5% fail on All direction indicators
- 3.5% fail on Individual lamps
- 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
-
8.1% fail on
Flashing type
-
5.8% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.7% fail on Rear lamps
- 1.2% fail on Front lamps
- 4.7% fail on Horn
- 3.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 3.5% fail on Stop lamp
- 1.2% fail on Battery
-
1.2% fail on
Hazard warning
- 1.2% fail on Switch
-
10% fail on
Headlamps
(2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
17% fail on
Brakes
-
10% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
8.1% fail on
Components
(2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 7.0% fail on Pipes (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Hoses
- 1.2% fail on Reservoirs
- 3.5% fail on Leaks (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
8.1% fail on
Components
(2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
10% fail on
Brake performance
- 5.8% fail on Front wheels
- 5.8% fail on Parking brake performance
- 4.7% fail on Rear wheels
- 4.7% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.2% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.2% fail on Condition
- 1.2% fail on Restricted movement
-
10% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
16% fail on
Suspension
-
10% fail on
Prescribed areas
(160% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 8.1% fail on Component mounting (190% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Subframe mounting
-
3.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
3.5% fail on
Drive shafts
-
3.5% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 3.5% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
3.5% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
1.2% fail on
Trailing arms
- 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.2% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 1.2% fail on Condition
-
1.2% fail on
Torque/reaction arms
- 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.2% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.2% fail on Front
-
1.2% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.2% fail on Condition
-
10% fail on
Prescribed areas
(160% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
14% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 12% fail on Washers (150% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Wipers
- 1.2% fail on Mirrors
-
8.1% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
8.1% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 8.1% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
8.1% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Steering
-
5.8% fail on
Steering system
- 4.7% fail on Track rod end
- 1.2% fail on Steering rack
-
5.8% fail on
Steering system
-
5.8% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 2.3% fail on Emissions
- 1.2% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.2% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.2% fail on Cap
- 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
-
4.7% fail on
Tyres
- 2.3% fail on Tread depth
- 1.2% fail on Size/type
- 1.2% fail on Condition
-
4.7% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 2.3% fail on Body security (44 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Body condition
-
2.3% fail on
Seats
- 2.3% fail on Drivers
-
1.2% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.2% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
Read the Honest John Review