Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks
Citroen 2CV MOT Results
68.4% pass rate
from 2,832 tests in 2021
(18% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
Number of tests by age
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen 2CV is unusually good or bad.
-
18% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(45% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(190% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(190% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (190% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(190% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
(56% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim (56% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
5.3% fail on
Direction indicators
(86% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Flashing type
(87% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Individual direction indicators (92% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Side repeaters (130% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.60% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.18% fail on Switch (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Flashing type
(87% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Headlamps
(31% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Headlamp (30% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Dipswitch
- 3.0% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.2% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
(2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Main beam tell-tale (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
0.95% fail on
Electrical equipment
(48% better than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Horn (49% better than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.071% fail on Trailer electrical socket (6 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.071% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.56% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (55% better than other pre-1990 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.11% fail on Switch
- 0.071% fail on Position lamp
- 0.035% fail on All position lamps
-
0.18% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.18% fail on Switch
- 0.11% fail on Rear reflectors
-
6.7% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(190% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(48% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Transmission
(170% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.071% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.071% fail on Joints
-
3.7% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.4% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
1.3% fail on
Doors
(160% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Front passenger's door
(3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Pillar
- 0.035% fail on Catch
-
0.14% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.11% fail on Door condition
- 0.035% fail on Hinge
-
0.14% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.11% fail on Door condition
- 0.035% fail on Catch
-
1.2% fail on
Front passenger's door
(3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
0.81% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.32% fail on Pipe
- 0.28% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.18% fail on Hose
- 0.035% fail on Tank
-
0.60% fail on
Chassis
- 0.60% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.60% fail on
Seats
- 0.46% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.25% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.46% fail on Floor (180% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Body
- 0.18% fail on Other body component
- 0.071% fail on Body condition
- 0.071% fail on Panel
- 0.071% fail on Bumpers
-
0.071% fail on
Cabs
- 0.071% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.035% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.035% fail on Boot lid condition
-
3.7% fail on
Transmission
(170% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
8.4% fail on
Suspension
-
3.4% fail on
Axles
(8 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 2.4% fail on King pins (25 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.071% fail on Stub axle (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.071% fail on Swivel joints/housing
- 0.035% fail on Axle
- 2.0% fail on Wheel bearings (42% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (39% better than other pre-1990 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Suspension arms
(43% better than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.071% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.071% fail on Ball joint (88% better than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.071% fail on Ball joint dust cover (87% better than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.74% fail on
Other suspension component
(100% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.071% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.035% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.18% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.18% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.11% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
- 0.035% fail on Suspension unit
- 0.035% fail on Pipes
- 0.035% fail on Other components
-
0.071% fail on
Springs
(90% better than other pre-1990 cars)
-
0.035% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.035% fail on Mounting
- 0.035% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.035% fail on
Coil springs
-
3.4% fail on
Axles
(8 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
7.6% fail on
Brakes
-
5.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.071% fail on Plate brake tester (sp) (6 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
2.1% fail on
Service brake performance
(31% better than other pre-1990 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt
(30% better than other pre-1990 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Service brake performance (31% better than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.035% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.035% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt
(30% better than other pre-1990 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(31% better than other pre-1990 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(30% better than other pre-1990 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 1.0% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.035% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.035% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(30% better than other pre-1990 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.74% fail on
Rbt
- 0.60% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.14% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.74% fail on
Rbt
- 0.14% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
0.74% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.42% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.39% fail on Brake pads
- 0.035% fail on Brake linings
-
0.39% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.39% fail on Brake discs
-
0.42% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.71% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.46% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.25% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.21% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.42% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.25% fail on Pedal
- 0.18% fail on Hand lever
-
0.32% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.25% fail on Master cylinder (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.035% fail on Valves
-
0.28% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.28% fail on Lever
-
0.14% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.14% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.11% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
- 0.035% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
- 0.035% fail on Other braking system component
-
0.14% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
5.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.0% fail on
Visibility
- 3.7% fail on Washers
- 2.5% fail on Wipers
- 0.32% fail on Bonnet
-
0.071% fail on
View to rear
- 0.071% fail on Mirrors
-
0.035% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.035% fail on Windscreen
-
4.7% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
4.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.6% fail on
Spark ignition
- 3.9% fail on Non catalyst emissions (29% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.14% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
0.071% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.035% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.035% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
4.6% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.18% fail on
Fluid leaks
(68% better than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.035% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
4.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(170% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Seat belts
(170% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Condition
- 0.071% fail on Attachment
- 0.071% fail on Requirements
-
4.4% fail on
Seat belts
(170% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Steering
(49% better than other pre-1990 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.2% fail on Track rod end
-
0.14% fail on
Other components
- 0.071% fail on Steering component
- 0.071% fail on Steering linkage
- 0.071% fail on Locking devices
- 0.035% fail on Ball joint
- 0.035% fail on Drag link end
- 0.035% fail on Steering arm
- 0.21% fail on Steering column
-
0.071% fail on
Steering gear
(94% better than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Operation
- 0.035% fail on Steering rack
-
0.071% fail on
Steering play
- 0.071% fail on Steering rack
- 0.035% fail on Prescribed areas
-
1.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.8% fail on
Tyres
- 0.95% fail on Tread depth (91% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Condition
- 0.25% fail on Size/type (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.64% fail on Registration plates
-
0.11% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.071% fail on Attachment
- 0.035% fail on Condition
-
0.071% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.071% fail on Speedometer
-
0.035% fail on
Buses and coaches supplementary tests
-
0.035% fail on
Doors
- 0.035% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors
-
0.035% fail on
Doors
Read the Honest John Review
-
Citroen 2CV and 2CV6 1948 - 1990
Tin Snail is a economy motoring icon, comfortable, long-legged, limpet-like grip and a roll-back canvas roof