Do you want the Road Tax system to change? Do you have thoughts on the potential changes to the Road Tax system? | No thanks
Bedford CF MOT Results
59.2% pass rate
from 497 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 vans and highlighted areas where the Bedford CF is unusually good or bad.
-
27% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
7.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 6.2% fail on Headlamp
- 0.80% fail on Switch (4 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
-
0.40% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.40% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
-
0.40% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.40% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 0.20% fail on Dipswitch
- 6.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
6.4% fail on
Position lamps
- 3.6% fail on Front lamps
- 2.2% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.60% fail on All position lamps
- 0.20% fail on Switch
-
6.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(67% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
- 5.6% fail on Fog lamp (76% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
- 0.60% fail on Tell tale
- 0.20% fail on Switch
-
5.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
5.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.0% fail on Individual lamps
- 1.6% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.60% fail on Switch
- 0.40% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.40% fail on Tell tales
-
5.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim
- 4.0% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.8% fail on
Hazard warning
(150% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
- 3.0% fail on Lamp (190% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Switch
- 0.20% fail on Tell tale
- 3.2% fail on Horn
- 1.4% fail on Battery
- 1.0% fail on Rear reflectors (4 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
- 0.60% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.40% fail on Electrical wiring
-
7.2% fail on
Headlamps
-
18% fail on
Brakes
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
- 10% fail on Front wheels (81% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
- 7.2% fail on Rear wheels
- 3.2% fail on Brake imbalance (150% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
- 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance (53% better than other pre-1990 vans)
- 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.60% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
5.8% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
5.0% fail on
Components
- 2.8% fail on Pipes
- 1.4% fail on Valves (2 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Hoses
- 0.20% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.40% fail on Leaks
- 0.20% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.20% fail on Operation
-
5.0% fail on
Components
-
1.4% fail on
Service brake control components
-
1.4% fail on
Pedal
- 1.0% fail on Anti-slip (2 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
- 0.60% fail on Condition
-
1.4% fail on
Pedal
-
0.60% fail on
Hub components
- 0.60% fail on Wheel cylinder (7 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
-
0.60% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.40% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
- 0.20% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
-
0.20% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.20% fail on Condition
-
0.20% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.20% fail on Cable
-
0.20% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.20% fail on Leaks
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
-
14% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 8.9% fail on Washers
- 6.8% fail on Wipers
- 0.80% fail on Mirrors
- 0.40% fail on Windscreen
- 0.20% fail on Bonnet
-
13% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(47% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
- 5.0% fail on Emissions
- 4.8% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.8% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.0% fail on Cap
- 0.80% fail on System
- 0.60% fail on Pipe
- 0.20% fail on Tank
- 0.20% fail on Hose
- 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
-
11% fail on
Suspension
(37% better than other pre-1990 vans)
-
4.4% fail on
Prescribed areas
(48% better than other pre-1990 vans)
- 2.0% fail on Component mounting (69% better than other pre-1990 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Spring mounting
- 1.2% fail on Subframe mounting
-
2.6% fail on
Shock absorbers
(160% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
- 2.6% fail on Condition (160% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.6% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.4% fail on Front
- 0.20% fail on Rear
-
1.2% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.80% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.40% fail on Attachment
- 0.20% fail on Condition
-
0.60% fail on
Leaf springs
-
0.20% fail on
Pins and bushes
- 0.20% fail on Shackle
- 0.20% fail on Anchor bracket
- 0.20% fail on Securing bolts
-
0.20% fail on
Pins and bushes
-
0.20% fail on
Fluid suspension
- 0.20% fail on Suspension unit
-
4.4% fail on
Prescribed areas
(48% better than other pre-1990 vans)
-
6.8% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 2.6% fail on Body condition
-
2.0% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 2.0% fail on Chassis
- 1.0% fail on Speedometer
-
1.0% fail on
Seats
- 1.0% fail on Drivers
- 0.20% fail on Passengers
-
0.60% fail on
Doors
- 0.40% fail on Drivers
- 0.20% fail on Passengers front
- 0.20% fail on Body security
-
4.4% fail on
Steering
-
4.2% fail on
Steering system
- 3.2% fail on Steering rack
- 0.80% fail on Track rod end
- 0.20% fail on Ball joint
-
0.20% fail on
Steering control
-
0.20% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.20% fail on Flexible coupling
-
0.20% fail on
Steering coupling
-
4.2% fail on
Steering system
-
3.2% fail on
Tyres
- 3.0% fail on Condition
- 0.40% fail on Valve stem
- 0.20% fail on Tread depth
-
2.0% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
2.0% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.0% fail on Prescribed areas (66% better than other pre-1990 vans)
- 0.60% fail on Requirements
- 0.60% fail on Condition
-
2.0% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.40% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.20% fail on Registration plate
- 0.20% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
-
0.20% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.20% fail on Condition