MOT Results

Honest John Classics MOT Results » Bedford » CF

Bedford CF MOT Results

61.9% pass rate
from 210 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 vans and highlighted areas where the Bedford CF is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 18% fail on Brake performance (49% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 11% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (170% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (sp) (170% worse than other pre-1990 vans)
          • 8.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
          • 6.2% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 10% fail on Service brake performance
        • 10% fail on Rbt
          • 8.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 3.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (5 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
          • 0.95% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.48% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.4% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (3 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (6 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 0.95% fail on Air and vacuum systems (6 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
      • 0.95% fail on Servos (11 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 0.95% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.48% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.48% fail on Pedal
    • 0.48% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.48% fail on Servos
    • 0.48% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.48% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.48% fail on Cable
  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 5.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 5.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 5.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 4.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.48% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.95% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.9% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 1.4% fail on Horn
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.48% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.48% fail on Switch
  • 12% fail on Visibility
    • 8.6% fail on Washers
    • 5.7% fail on Wipers
    • 0.48% fail on View to rear
      • 0.48% fail on Mirrors
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 5.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.4% fail on Springs
      • 1.9% fail on Leaf springs (7 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
        • 0.95% fail on Leaf spring (19 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
        • 0.48% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
        • 0.48% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
      • 0.48% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.48% fail on Coil spring
    • 2.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.95% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.95% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.95% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.9% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.95% fail on Pipe
      • 0.95% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 1.9% fail on Seats
      • 1.4% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.95% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 1.4% fail on Chassis
      • 1.4% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.4% fail on Transmission
      • 1.4% fail on Prop shafts (5 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
        • 0.95% fail on Prop shaft (5 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
        • 0.95% fail on Bearing housing (31 times worse than other pre-1990 vans)
    • 0.95% fail on Doors
      • 0.95% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.95% fail on Door condition
    • 0.48% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.48% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.48% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.48% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.48% fail on Body
      • 0.48% fail on Panel
    • 0.48% fail on Floor
    • 0.48% fail on Cabs
      • 0.48% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 5.2% fail on Steering
    • 2.9% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.9% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.95% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.4% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.9% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.48% fail on Operation
    • 0.48% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.48% fail on Steering wheel
  • 4.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.4% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.4% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.48% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.48% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.4% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.95% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.48% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 1.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
      • 0.48% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.4% fail on Tyres
    • 0.95% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.48% fail on Condition
  • 0.95% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.95% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.48% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.48% fail on Attachment