Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Austin A35 MOT Results

82.4% pass rate
from 85 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Austin A35 is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.4% fail on Brakes
    • 5.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.2% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.2% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.2% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
    • 2.4% fail on Hydraulic systems (8 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Master cylinder (42 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (6 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 1.2% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 2.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.2% fail on Brake drums
      • 1.2% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 1.2% fail on Clevis joint
    • 1.2% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.2% fail on Pedal
    • 1.2% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.2% fail on Lever
  • 9.4% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.2% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.2% fail on Horn
  • 4.7% fail on Suspension
    • 2.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.2% fail on Springs
      • 1.2% fail on Leaf springs
        • 1.2% fail on Anchor bracket
    • 1.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.2% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 3.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.5% fail on Fuel system (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Hose
      • 1.2% fail on Pipe
      • 1.2% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 1.2% fail on System
  • 2.4% fail on Visibility
    • 2.4% fail on Washers
    • 1.2% fail on Wipers
  • 1.2% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.2% fail on Steering
    • 1.2% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.2% fail on Steering box
  • 1.2% fail on Tyres
    • 1.2% fail on Condition