Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Audi Quattro

74.1% pass rate
from 559 tests in 2016
Number of tests by age
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Audi Quattro is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (70% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.5% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.36% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.5% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.18% fail on Tell tales
    • 2.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.3% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.89% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.18% fail on Switch
    • 2.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamps (59% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp (60% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Matched pair
      • 0.18% fail on Dipswitch
    • 1.3% fail on Horn
    • 0.18% fail on Battery
    • 0.18% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.18% fail on Lamp
  • 9.8% fail on Suspension
    • 3.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.5% fail on Subframe mounting (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Component mounting (76% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.36% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Macpherson strut (12 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Condition (12 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Drive shafts
      • 1.4% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 1.4% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.72% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.54% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.54% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.36% fail on Front
      • 0.18% fail on Rear
    • 0.54% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.36% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.36% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.18% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.18% fail on Location
    • 0.18% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.18% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 8.2% fail on Brakes (31% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Brake performance (39% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.0% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.4% fail on Front wheels (64% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.18% fail on Brake operation
    • 3.0% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 2.7% fail on Components
        • 2.0% fail on Hoses
        • 0.89% fail on Pipes
        • 0.18% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.18% fail on Valves
      • 0.36% fail on Leaks
      • 0.18% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 1.1% fail on ABS (9 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.36% fail on Hub components
      • 0.18% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.18% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.18% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.18% fail on Pedal
        • 0.18% fail on Condition
  • 6.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.5% fail on Emissions (70% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.72% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.36% fail on Pipe
      • 0.36% fail on System
  • 6.1% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.0% fail on Washers
    • 2.0% fail on Wipers
  • 1.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (53% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Body condition
    • 0.36% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.36% fail on Chassis
    • 0.36% fail on Doors
      • 0.18% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.18% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.36% fail on Seats
      • 0.18% fail on Passengers
      • 0.18% fail on Drivers
    • 0.18% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.89% fail on Steering (82% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Steering system (91% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.18% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.36% fail on Power steering
      • 0.36% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.18% fail on Steering operation
  • 0.72% fail on Tyres (72% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Tread depth
  • 0.54% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (76% better than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Seat belts (76% better than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.54% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.54% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.18% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.18% fail on Attachment
 

Ask Honest John

Amount to borrow
Sorry. The minimum loan amount is £1000
To pay back over

My credit score

Best available rate 9.20%

Total repayment £8,930.17

Total cost of credit £1,430.17

£186.05

48 monthly payments

Apply now

Representative example

Borrowing £7,500 over 4 years with a representative APR of 25.4%, an annual interest rate of 25.4% (Fixed) and a deposit of £0.00, the amount payable would be £239.77 per month, with a total cost of credit of £4,008.96 and a total amount payable of £11,508.96.

CarFinance 247 Limited is acting as an independent credit broker

Universal Square, Devonshire Street North, Manchester, M12 6JH