Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Triumph Toledo MOT Results

63.3% pass rate
from 90 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Triumph Toledo is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 10% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 7.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (190% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.2% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.3% fail on All direction indicators
        • 1.1% fail on Individual lamps
    • 2.2% fail on Hazard warning
      • 1.1% fail on Lamp
      • 1.1% fail on Switch
    • 1.1% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.1% fail on Horn
  • 21% fail on Brakes (82% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 16% fail on Brake performance
      • 10% fail on Front wheels (160% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 7.8% fail on Rear wheels
      • 6.7% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 5.6% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 5.6% fail on Components
        • 3.3% fail on Pipes
        • 2.2% fail on Hoses
    • 2.2% fail on Restricted movement (6 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
  • 18% fail on Driver's view of the road (150% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 13% fail on Washers (180% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers
    • 1.1% fail on Windscreen
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 8.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 7.8% fail on Component mounting (180% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 3.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 3.3% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 3.3% fail on Front
    • 3.3% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 3.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.1% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.1% fail on Attachment
  • 14% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 11% fail on Steering system (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 8.9% fail on Track rod end (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Steering rack
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.2% fail on Steering control
      • 1.1% fail on Steering column
      • 1.1% fail on Steering coupling
        • 1.1% fail on Universal joint
    • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 7.8% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.2% fail on Emissions
  • 6.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 4.4% fail on Doors (6 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Passengers front (7 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Drivers
      • 1.1% fail on Passengers other
    • 1.1% fail on Speedometer
    • 1.1% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.1% fail on Chassis
    • 1.1% fail on Body condition
  • 3.3% fail on Tyres
    • 1.1% fail on Size/type
    • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.1% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.1% fail on Attachment
  • 1.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.1% fail on Condition