Do you want the Road Tax system to change? Do you have thoughts on the potential changes to the Road Tax system? | No thanks
Triumph Toledo MOT Results
63.3% pass rate
from 90 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Triumph Toledo is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 10% fail on Headlamp aim
- 7.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (190% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Position lamps
- 3.3% fail on Front lamps
- 2.2% fail on Rear lamps
-
4.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.4% fail on Headlamp
- 4.4% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
4.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.3% fail on All direction indicators
- 1.1% fail on Individual lamps
-
4.4% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.2% fail on
Hazard warning
- 1.1% fail on Lamp
- 1.1% fail on Switch
- 1.1% fail on Electrical wiring
- 1.1% fail on Horn
-
21% fail on
Brakes
(82% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
16% fail on
Brake performance
- 10% fail on Front wheels (160% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 7.8% fail on Rear wheels
- 6.7% fail on Parking brake performance
- 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.1% fail on Brake imbalance
-
5.6% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
5.6% fail on
Components
- 3.3% fail on Pipes
- 2.2% fail on Hoses
-
5.6% fail on
Components
- 2.2% fail on Restricted movement (6 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
16% fail on
Brake performance
-
18% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(150% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 13% fail on Washers (180% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Wipers
- 1.1% fail on Windscreen
-
16% fail on
Suspension
-
8.9% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 7.8% fail on Component mounting (180% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Subframe mounting
-
3.3% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
3.3% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 3.3% fail on Front
-
3.3% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 3.3% fail on Condition
-
1.1% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.1% fail on
Sub-frames
- 1.1% fail on Attachment
-
8.9% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
14% fail on
Steering
(2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
11% fail on
Steering system
(2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 8.9% fail on Track rod end (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Steering rack
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint
-
2.2% fail on
Steering control
- 1.1% fail on Steering column
-
1.1% fail on
Steering coupling
- 1.1% fail on Universal joint
- 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas
-
11% fail on
Steering system
(2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 5.6% fail on Exhaust system
- 2.2% fail on Emissions
-
6.7% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
4.4% fail on
Doors
(6 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Passengers front (7 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Drivers
- 1.1% fail on Passengers other
- 1.1% fail on Speedometer
-
1.1% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.1% fail on Chassis
- 1.1% fail on Body condition
-
4.4% fail on
Doors
(6 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Tyres
- 1.1% fail on Size/type
- 1.1% fail on Condition
- 1.1% fail on Tread depth
-
1.1% fail on
Road Wheels
- 1.1% fail on Attachment
-
1.1% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
1.1% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.1% fail on Condition
-
1.1% fail on
Seat belts