Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Reliant Kitten MOT Results

74.5% pass rate
from 51 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Reliant Kitten is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.8% fail on Suspension
    • 3.9% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.0% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 2.0% fail on Sub-frames
      • 2.0% fail on Sub-frame
    • 2.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 9.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 9.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 9.8% fail on Spark ignition
        • 9.8% fail on Non catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
  • 7.8% fail on Brakes
    • 7.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.9% fail on Rbt
          • 3.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt
          • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
  • 3.9% fail on Visibility
    • 2.0% fail on Wipers
    • 2.0% fail on Washers
  • 3.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.0% fail on Chassis
      • 2.0% fail on Chassis condition
    • 2.0% fail on Doors
      • 2.0% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 2.0% fail on Door condition
  • 3.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.9% fail on Condition (8 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
  • 2.0% fail on Tyres
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth
Read the Honest John Review