Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Nissan S-Cargo MOT Results

45.3% pass rate
from 64 tests in 2017
(87% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan S-Cargo is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 4.7% fail on Rear lamps
    • 7.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 7.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 7.8% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 7.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 6.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Battery
    • 1.6% fail on Hazard warning
      • 1.6% fail on Lamp
  • 25% fail on Suspension (160% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 13% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 13% fail on Component mounting (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 11% fail on Front suspension joints (10 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Front drive shafts (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 4.7% fail on Constant velocity joints (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.6% fail on Condition
  • 23% fail on Brakes (100% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 19% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 13% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 13% fail on Rear wheels (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.1% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 3.1% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 3.1% fail on Components
        • 1.6% fail on Pipes
        • 1.6% fail on Hoses
        • 1.6% fail on Reservoirs
    • 1.6% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 1.6% fail on Hub components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
  • 17% fail on Driver's view of the road (140% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 11% fail on Washers
    • 6.3% fail on Wipers
    • 1.6% fail on Mirrors
  • 14% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (140% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Emissions
    • 6.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.7% fail on Emissions not tested (15 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
  • 7.8% fail on Tyres (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Tread depth (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Condition
  • 7.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 7.8% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
  • 6.3% fail on Steering
    • 4.7% fail on Steering system
      • 4.7% fail on Steering rack
      • 1.6% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.6% fail on Power steering
      • 1.6% fail on Other components
  • 4.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.6% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.6% fail on Chassis
    • 1.6% fail on Body condition
    • 1.6% fail on Doors
      • 1.6% fail on Passengers front
  • 4.7% fail on Registration plates and VIN (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Registration plate (5 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)