MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Nissan » Figaro » 2010

Nissan Figaro MOT Results

Registered in 2010
57.0% pass rate
from 121 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Figaro is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (67% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 14% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (23 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 14% fail on Rear fog lamp (23 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 14% fail on Rear fog lamp (23 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.83% fail on Switch
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.83% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.7% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.7% fail on Battery(ies) (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.83% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.83% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.83% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Exhaust system (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Transmission
      • 4.1% fail on Drive shafts
        • 4.1% fail on Joints
    • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure (30 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (43 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Doors (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Front passenger's door (21 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Door condition (23 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.83% fail on Chassis
      • 0.83% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.83% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.83% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.83% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.83% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.83% fail on Bracket
    • 0.83% fail on Floor
    • 0.83% fail on Seats
      • 0.83% fail on Driver's seat
  • 12% fail on Suspension
    • 9.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (93 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.83% fail on Springs
      • 0.83% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.83% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.83% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.83% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 11% fail on Steering (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.4% fail on Steering gear (23 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 7.4% fail on Steering rack (24 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.7% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.83% fail on Power steering
      • 0.83% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.83% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.83% fail on Universal joint
  • 7.4% fail on Brakes
    • 4.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt
          • 0.83% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.83% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.83% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.83% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.83% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.83% fail on Rbt
          • 0.83% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.83% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.83% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 1.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.83% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.83% fail on Pedal
    • 0.83% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.83% fail on Lever
  • 5.8% fail on Visibility
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers
    • 2.5% fail on Washers
  • 5.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Seat belts (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Prescribed areas (92 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 4.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.1% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.5% fail on Emissions not tested (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.83% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.83% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.83% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.83% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 3.3% fail on Tyres
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.83% fail on Size/type
  • 1.7% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.83% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.83% fail on Vehicle Identification Number

Search Good Garages