MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Nissan » Figaro » 2006

Nissan Figaro MOT Results

Registered in 2006
62.3% pass rate
from 334 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Figaro is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 5.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Switch
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.60% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.1% fail on Electrical equipment (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Horn (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 1.5% fail on Stop lamp (64% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.90% fail on Headlamps (81% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Headlamp (80% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.30% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.30% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.30% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.30% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure (65% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Transmission
      • 3.3% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.3% fail on Joints
    • 2.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Chassis (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Chassis condition (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Doors
      • 0.30% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.30% fail on Door condition
      • 0.30% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.30% fail on Door condition
    • 0.30% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.30% fail on Hose
    • 0.30% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.30% fail on Carrier
    • 0.30% fail on Body
      • 0.30% fail on Panel
    • 0.30% fail on Seats
      • 0.30% fail on Driver's seat
  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 9.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.90% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.60% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.60% fail on Springs (88% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Coil springs (88% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.60% fail on Coil spring (88% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.30% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 9.6% fail on Brakes
    • 6.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt
          • 3.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 3.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt
          • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.60% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 1.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.90% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.90% fail on Lever
    • 0.90% fail on Hydraulic systems (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.30% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.90% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.90% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (11 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.30% fail on Pedal
      • 0.30% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.30% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.30% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.30% fail on Brake pads
  • 9.0% fail on Visibility
    • 5.7% fail on Washers
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers
  • 7.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (200% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Seat belts (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Prescribed areas (10 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Condition
  • 6.0% fail on Steering (84% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Steering gear (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Power steering (9 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Pipes and hoses (14 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Other components (10 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Rams (48 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Operation
    • 1.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.8% fail on Track rod end
  • 5.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.8% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.7% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.2% fail on Non catalyst emissions (28 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.30% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.30% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 3.0% fail on Tyres (55% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.90% fail on Tread depth (76% better than other 2006 cars)
  • 0.60% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.60% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages