Do you want the Road Tax system to change? Do you have thoughts on the potential changes to the Road Tax system? | No thanks
Mitsubishi Delica / L300 / L400 MOT Results
58.1% pass rate
from 86 tests in 2017
(43% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Delica / L300 / L400 is unusually good or bad.
-
22% fail on
Suspension
(130% worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
13% fail on
Prescribed areas
(2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 8.1% fail on Spring mounting (7 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Component mounting
-
5.8% fail on
Suspension arms
(3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 2.3% fail on Condition
-
1.2% fail on
Leaf springs
-
1.2% fail on
Pins and bushes
- 1.2% fail on Shackle
-
1.2% fail on
Pins and bushes
- 1.2% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.2% fail on
Drive shafts
-
1.2% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 1.2% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
1.2% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
13% fail on
Prescribed areas
(2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
19% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
7.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Fog lamp
- 1.2% fail on Tell tale
- 7.0% fail on Headlamp aim
-
5.8% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.7% fail on Front lamps
- 1.2% fail on All position lamps
- 1.2% fail on Rear lamps
- 5.8% fail on Stop lamp
- 4.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 1.2% fail on Electrical wiring
- 1.2% fail on Horn
-
7.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brakes
-
10% fail on
Brake performance
- 5.8% fail on Rear wheels
- 5.8% fail on Parking brake performance
- 2.3% fail on Front wheels
- 1.2% fail on Brake imbalance
- 1.2% fail on Gradient hand brake
- 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
-
5.8% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
4.7% fail on
Components
- 3.5% fail on Pipes
- 1.2% fail on Hoses
- 1.2% fail on Leaks
-
4.7% fail on
Components
-
1.2% fail on
Hub components
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads
-
1.2% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 1.2% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
-
10% fail on
Brake performance
-
12% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 9.3% fail on Wipers (2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Windscreen
- 1.2% fail on Washers
-
8.1% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 3.5% fail on Exhaust system
- 3.5% fail on Emissions
-
1.2% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.2% fail on System
-
7.0% fail on
Steering
-
4.7% fail on
Steering system
- 3.5% fail on Track rod end
- 1.2% fail on Steering rack
- 1.2% fail on Ball joint
-
1.2% fail on
Steering control
-
1.2% fail on
Steering coupling
- 1.2% fail on Universal joint
-
1.2% fail on
Steering coupling
- 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
-
4.7% fail on
Steering system
-
7.0% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
7.0% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.2% fail on Requirements
- 1.2% fail on Condition
-
7.0% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
-
7.0% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 4.7% fail on Body condition
-
1.2% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.2% fail on Chassis
-
1.2% fail on
Seats
- 1.2% fail on Drivers
-
4.7% fail on
Tyres
- 2.3% fail on Tread depth
- 1.2% fail on Size/type
- 1.2% fail on Condition
-
1.2% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.2% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mitsubishi Delica 1994
Versatile interior layout, Shogun underpinnings, some are very well equipped, ideal for congested city streets or country lanes, refined long-distance ability